Tuesday, January 9, 2024

💥💥💥 What is Helyx-OS and what is used for ?

Helyx-OS is an open-source graphical user interface (GUI) for OpenFOAM, a free and open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software1. It allows users to perform pre-processing tasks such as meshing, case definition and solver execution. It supports both OpenFOAM and OpenFOAM+, and works on Linux and Windows platforms2.

Helyx-OS is designed to facilitate the usage of the standard OpenFOAM libraries, by removing the complexity of text based case definition in favour of an intuitive easy-to-use graphical user interface. It is intended for academic use and entry-level CFD work1. If you are looking for an enterprise CFD solution for industrial applications, you can check out HELYX, a more advanced CFD software product developed by ENGYS3.

Is Helyx-os completely free?

Yes, Helyx-OS is completely free for academic use and entry-level CFD work. It is released to the public under the GNU General Public License1. However, if you are looking for an enterprise CFD solution for industrial applications, or if you require technical support and/or training for Helyx-OS and OpenFOAM, you may need to pay for those services2. You can contact ENGYS, the developer of Helyx-OS, for more information3.

Can I use Helyx-OS for commercial purposes?

According to the developer of Helyx-OS, ENGYS, the software is intended for academic use and entry-level CFD work, and it is delivered to the public under the GNU General Public License1. This means that you can use Helyx-OS for commercial purposes, as long as you comply with the terms and conditions of the license2. However, you may not receive any technical support or documentation from ENGYS, unless you pay for those services1. If you are looking for an enterprise CFD solution for industrial applications, you may want to consider HELYX, a more advanced CFD software product developed by ENGYS3. HELYX is not free, but it offers more features, reliability and support than Helyx-OS2.

What is difference between Helyx-os  and HELYX ?

The main difference between Helyx-OS and HELYX is that Helyx-OS is an open-source graphical user interface (GUI) for OpenFOAM, a free and open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, while HELYX is a comprehensive general purpose CFD software package for engineering analysis and design optimisation of enterprise applications, based on ENGYS’ own open-source CFD simulation engine12.

Helyx-OS is intended for academic use and entry-level CFD work, and it is delivered to the public under the GNU General Public License. It supports both OpenFOAM and OpenFOAM+, and works on Linux and Windows platforms. It allows users to perform pre-processing tasks such as meshing, case definition and solver execution. It does not provide any technical support or documentation from ENGYS, unless users pay for those services13.

HELYX is a unified, off-the-shelf CFD software product compatible with most Linux and Windows platforms, including high-performance computing systems. It features an advanced hex-dominant automatic mesh algorithm with polyhedra support, a wide range of physical models, and a Generalised Internal Boundaries method to support complex boundary motions. It also incorporates an extensive set of ancillary services to facilitate the deployment and usage of the software in any working environment. It offers more features, reliability and support than Helyx-OS, but it is not free24.

Can I modify Helyx-OS for my own purposes?

Yes, you can modify Helyx-OS for your own purposes, as long as you comply with the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License1. Helyx-OS is an open-source graphical user interface (GUI) for OpenFOAM, a free and open-source computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software2. The source code of Helyx-OS is available on GitHub3, where you can also find instructions on how to compile it on your own4. However, if you modify Helyx-OS, you may not receive any technical support or documentation from ENGYS, the developer of Helyx-OS, unless you pay for those services2. You may also want to check out the FAQ page of Helyx-OS for more information.

What is difference in functionaity between Helyx-os and HELYX for CFD simulations ?

The difference in functionality between Helyx-OS and HELYX for CFD simulations is mainly related to the following aspects:

In summary, Helyx-OS is a free and open-source GUI for OpenFOAM, intended for academic use and entry-level CFD work. HELYX is a comprehensive and cost-effective CFD software package for engineering analysis and design optimisation of enterprise applications, based on ENGYS’ own open-source CFD simulation engine.

Monday, January 8, 2024

📚 📚 📚 A story about a Smurf who wanted to optimize his hat in Ansys (drag force) to run faster while escaping from Gargamel

 Smurf was always fascinated by Ansys, the software that could simulate anything from bridges to rockets. He wanted to use it to improve his own life, and he had a brilliant idea: he would optimize his hat to make it more aerodynamic.

He borrowed a laptop from Handy Smurf and installed Ansys on it. He scanned his hat with a 3D scanner and imported the model into Ansys. He set up the boundary conditions and the mesh, and ran the simulation.

He was shocked by the results. His hat had a very high drag coefficient, which meant that it slowed him down a lot when he ran. He decided to try different shapes and sizes for his hat, and see which one had the lowest drag.

He spent hours tweaking his hat model, running simulations, and comparing results. He tried hats that were longer, shorter, wider, narrower, curved, flat, pointed, round, and everything in between. He even tried hats that looked like wings, cones, and propellers.

He finally found the optimal shape for his hat. It was a sleek, streamlined, bullet-shaped hat that had the lowest drag coefficient he had ever seen. He was overjoyed. He printed the hat with a 3D printer and put it on his head. He felt a surge of confidence and excitement. He was ready to test his hat in the real world.

He ran outside and joined the other Smurfs who were playing in the meadow. He challenged them to a race. He was sure that he would win with his new hat. He lined up with the other Smurfs and waited for the signal.

Papa Smurf blew the whistle and the race began. Smurf sprinted ahead of the others, feeling the wind in his face and his hat cutting through the air. He was amazed by how fast he was going. He looked back and saw that he had left the other Smurfs far behind. He smiled and waved at them.

He was about to cross the finish line when he heard a loud roar. He turned his head and saw Gargamel, the evil wizard who hated the Smurfs and wanted to capture them. Gargamel had spotted Smurf and his shiny new hat, and was chasing him with a net.

Smurf panicked and tried to run faster, but it was too late. Gargamel was faster and stronger, and he caught up with Smurf. He swung his net and caught Smurf and his hat.

"Gotcha, you little blue pest!" Gargamel shouted. "And what is this? A new hat? How cute! It looks like a bullet! Well, it won't help you escape from me!"

He laughed maniacally and put Smurf and his hat in a cage. He carried the cage to his castle, where he planned to use Smurf and his hat for his experiments.

Smurf realized that his hat had not only failed to help him, but had also caused his capture. He regretted ever using Ansys and wished he had kept his old hat. He hoped that the other Smurfs would come and rescue him soon.

He learned a valuable lesson that day: sometimes, simpler is better.😁

Sunday, January 7, 2024

📚 📚 📚 Story about Jake, software engineer at Ansys 😁

Jake was bored. He had been working as a software engineer at Ansys for three years, and he felt like he had seen it all. He had simulated everything from fluid dynamics to structural mechanics, from electromagnetics to acoustics. He had helped countless clients optimize their designs and solve their engineering problems. But he wanted more. He wanted a challenge. He wanted excitement. He wanted adventure.

That's why he joined the Hackers Club, a secret group of Ansys employees who used their skills and access to create unauthorized and illegal simulations for fun. They had simulated wars, disasters, crimes, and fantasies. They had hacked into government databases, corporate networks, and military systems. They had created their own virtual reality world, where they could do anything they wanted without consequences.

But Jake wanted more. He wanted the ultimate simulation. He wanted to face the most terrifying and thrilling scenario imaginable. He wanted to survive a zombie apocalypse.

He had spent months working on his project, using Ansys to create realistic models of zombies, weapons, vehicles, buildings, and environments. He had programmed the zombies to behave according to various rules and parameters, such as speed, strength, intelligence, hunger, and infection. He had designed the weapons to have realistic physics and effects, such as recoil, accuracy, damage, and ammo. He had created the vehicles to have realistic performance and handling, such as speed, acceleration, braking, and fuel. He had modeled the buildings and environments to have realistic features and interactions, such as doors, windows, walls, floors, roofs, and objects. He had also added some random elements and surprises, such as weather, events, and encounters, to make the simulation more dynamic and unpredictable.

He had tested his simulation several times, tweaking and improving it until he was satisfied. He had also invited some of his fellow hackers to join him, promising them the most immersive and intense experience of their lives. They had agreed, eager to try his masterpiece.

They had chosen a night when they knew the security was lax and the building was empty. They had sneaked into the Ansys headquarters, where they had access to the most powerful computers and the most advanced VR equipment. They had plugged in their headsets, controllers, and suits, and entered the simulation.

They had chosen to start in a small town, where they had a car, some weapons, and some supplies. Their goal was to reach a military base, where they hoped to find a helicopter and escape. They had to avoid or fight the zombies, scavenge for resources, and cooperate with each other. They had also set the difficulty level to hard, meaning the zombies were faster, stronger, smarter, and more numerous. They wanted a challenge, after all.

They had been playing for an hour, and they had already faced many dangers and difficulties. They had lost their car, their ammo, and some of their supplies. They had also lost two of their teammates, who had been bitten and turned into zombies. They had to kill them, which was not easy, as they still looked and sounded like their friends. They had also encountered some other survivors, who were not friendly, and tried to rob them or kill them. They had to fight them, too, which was not easy, as they were also human.

They had reached the outskirts of the city, where they hoped to find another car, or at least a safe place to rest. They had been running and hiding for a while, and they were tired, hungry, thirsty, and scared. They had also lost contact with each other, as their radios had run out of battery. They had to find each other, and regroup.

Jake was alone, and he was scared. He had lost his gun, his knife, and his backpack. He had nothing but his clothes, his headset, and his controller. He had also lost his sense of direction, and he didn't know where he was. He had wandered into a dark alley, where he hoped to find a way out. He didn't.

He heard a growl behind him, and he turned around. He saw a zombie, and he froze. It was a woman, or it used to be. She had long blonde hair, blue eyes, and a pretty face. She was wearing a white dress, stained with blood. She looked familiar, and he realized why. She was his ex-girlfriend, Lisa. He had dated her for two years, and he had loved her. He had broken up with her six months ago, and he had regretted it. He had missed her, and he had wanted to see her again. He didn't.

She lunged at him, and he dodged. She grabbed his arm, and he pulled. She bit his shoulder, and he screamed. He felt a sharp pain, and a warm blood. He felt a cold numbness, and a dark fear. He knew he was infected, and he knew he was doomed. He pushed her away, and he ran. He ran out of the alley, and into the street. He saw more zombies, and he ran. He ran past cars, shops, and houses. He ran past people, alive and dead. He ran past his teammates, who saw him and called him. He ran past the military base, where he saw a helicopter and a fence. He ran past the exit, where he saw a button and a sign. He ran past everything, and he ran into nothing.

He collapsed, and he died. He died in the simulation, and he died in reality. He died of blood loss, and he died of shock. He died of infection, and he died of fear. He died alone, and he died in pain.

He died, and he woke up. He woke up in the Ansys headquarters, and he woke up in the real world. He woke up in his headset, and he woke up in his body. He woke up alive, and he woke up scared.

He looked around, and he saw his fellow hackers. They were also alive, and they were also scared. They had also died in the simulation, and they had also woken up in reality. They had also experienced the most immersive and intense experience of their lives, and they had also regretted it.

They looked at each other, and they said nothing. They said nothing, because they had nothing to say. They had nothing to say, because they had learned a lesson. They had learned a lesson, and they had learned it the hard way.

They had learned that some simulations are better left uncreated, and some experiences are better left untried. They had learned that some challenges are better left unaccepted, and some adventures are better left unexplored. They had learned that some fantasies are better left unrealized, and some realities are better left unchanged.

They had learned that some things are better left alone.``` 

THIS IS FICTIONAL STORY , DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME 🤓😁😁😁💥💥

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

💥💥💥 How to adjust the curve - validations methods

Curve adjustment is the process of modifying a model's parameters to improve its fit to the data. Validation is the process of evaluating a model's performance on a separate set of data that was not used for training. Validation methods are the techniques used to split the data into training and validation sets, and to measure the model's accuracy, precision, recall, etc.

One common validation method is the **validation curve**, which plots the training and validation scores for different values of a single hyperparameter. This can help you find the optimal value of the hyperparameter that minimizes the bias and variance of the model. You can use the `validation_curve` function from the `sklearn.model_selection` module to generate validation curves for different estimators¹².

Another validation method is the **learning curve**, which plots the training and validation scores for different sizes of the training set. This can help you determine if the model benefits from more training data, or if it suffers from overfitting or underfitting. You can use the `learning_curve` function from the `sklearn.model_selection` module to generate learning curves for different estimators¹.

There are other validation methods, such as cross-validation, bootstrap, hold-out, etc., that you can use depending on your data and model. You can find more information about them in the [User Guide](^1^) and the [Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide](^3^).

Source: 

(1) 3.4. Validation curves: plotting scores to evaluate models. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/learning_curve.html.

(2) sklearn.model_selection.validation_curve - scikit-learn. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.model_selection.validation_curve.html.

(3) 3.4. Validation curves: plotting scores to evaluate models. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/learning_curve.html.

(4) Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide | Built In. https://builtin.com/data-science/model-validation-test.

(5) Validation Curve - GeeksforGeeks. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/validation-curve/.

(6) Validation – Adjustment of NIR Calibrations | PerkinElmer Blog. https://blog.perkinelmer.com/posts/validation-adjustment-of-nir-calibrations/.

**Cross-validation** is a method that divides your data into **k** equal and non-overlapping subsets, called **folds**. Then, it trains your model on **k-1** folds, and tests it on the remaining fold. This process is repeated **k** times, so that each fold is used as the test set once. The average of the test scores across the **k** folds is the final performance measure of your model¹.

**Bootstrap** is a method that samples your data **with replacement**, meaning that the same data point can be selected more than once. It creates **B** new datasets, each with the same size as the original dataset, but with some data points repeated and some omitted. Then, it trains your model on each bootstrap dataset, and tests it on the original dataset. The average of the test scores across the **B** bootstrap datasets is the final performance measure of your model².

**Hold-out** is a method that splits your data into two parts: a **training set** and a **validation set**. The training set is used to fit your model, and the validation set is used to evaluate its performance. The size of the validation set is usually a fixed proportion of the original dataset, such as 20% or 30%. The performance measure of your model is the test score on the validation set³.

Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the size and characteristics of your data, and the complexity and variability of your model. You can find more information about them in the following links:

- [What is the difference between bootstrapping and cross-validation?](^1^)

- [4 Cross Validation Methods | Introduction to Applied Machine Learning](^2^)

- [Hold-out vs. Cross-validation in Machine Learning](^5^)

Source:

(1) What is the difference between bootstrapping and cross-validation?. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/32264/what-is-the-difference-between-bootstrapping-and-cross-validation.

(2) 4 Cross Validation Methods | Introduction to Applied Machine Learning. https://dionysus.psych.wisc.edu/iaml_2020/unit-04.html.

(3) Are K-Fold Cross Validation , Bootstrap ,Out of Bag fundamentally same?. https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/206807/are-k-fold-cross-validation-bootstrap-out-of-bag-fundamentally-same.

(4) What is the difference between bootstrapping and cross-validation?. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/32264/what-is-the-difference-between-bootstrapping-and-cross-validation.

(5) 4 Cross Validation Methods | Introduction to Applied Machine Learning. https://dionysus.psych.wisc.edu/iaml_2020/unit-04.html.

(6) Hold-out vs. Cross-validation in Machine Learning - Medium. https://medium.com/@jaz1/holdout-vs-cross-validation-in-machine-learning-7637112d3f8f.

(7) Bootstrapping vs Cross-Validation - Doc Zamora's ML & AI. https://www.doczamora.com/bootstrapping-vs-cross-validation.

(8) en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-validation_(statistics).

How do I choose the best validation method for my model?

Choosing the best validation method for your model depends on several factors, such as the size and characteristics of your data, the complexity and variability of your model, and the trade-off between bias and variance. 😊

There is no definitive answer to this question, as different validation methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, some general guidelines are:

- If your data is large and representative, you can use a simple **hold-out** method, where you split your data into a training set and a validation set, and use the validation set to evaluate your model's performance⁴.

- If your data is small or imbalanced, you can use a **cross-validation** method, where you divide your data into k folds, and use each fold as a validation set once, while using the rest as a training set. This way, you can use all your data for both training and validation, and reduce the variance of your model's performance¹.

- If your data is noisy or has high variance, you can use a **bootstrap** method, where you sample your data with replacement, and create new datasets that have the same size as the original dataset. Then, you can train and test your model on each bootstrap dataset, and average the performance across them. This way, you can reduce the bias of your model's performance².

You can also combine different validation methods, such as using cross-validation with hold-out, or bootstrap with cross-validation, to get more robust estimates of your model's performance.


To learn more about these validation methods, you can check out these links:

- [Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide](^1^)

- [The Ultimate Guide to Evaluation and Selection of Models in ML](^2^)

- [choosing model based on last or best iteration on validation set](^3^)

- [How To Choose The Right Test Options When Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms](^4^)

Source: 

(1) How To Choose The Right Test Options When Evaluating Machine Learning .... https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-choose-the-right-test-options-when-evaluating-machine-learning-algorithms/.

(2) Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide | Built In. https://builtin.com/data-science/model-validation-test.

(3) The Ultimate Guide to Evaluation and Selection of Models in ML - neptune.ai. https://neptune.ai/blog/ml-model-evaluation-and-selection.

(4) Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide | Built In. https://builtin.com/data-science/model-validation-test.

(5) The Ultimate Guide to Evaluation and Selection of Models in ML - neptune.ai. https://neptune.ai/blog/ml-model-evaluation-and-selection.

(6) choosing model based on last or best iteration on validation set. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/72002/choosing-model-based-on-last-or-best-iteration-on-validation-set.

(7) How To Choose The Right Test Options When Evaluating Machine Learning .... https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-choose-the-right-test-options-when-evaluating-machine-learning-algorithms/.

How do I measure the performance of my model?

There are different ways to measure the performance of your model, depending on the type of problem you are solving and the metrics you are interested in. 😊

For example, if you are solving a **classification** problem, where you want to predict discrete labels for your data, you can use metrics such as **accuracy**, **precision**, **recall**, and **F1 score**. These metrics evaluate how well your model can correctly identify the true classes of your data, and avoid false positives and false negatives. You can also use plots such as **ROC curve** and **confusion matrix** to visualize the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, and the distribution of errors across classes¹².

If you are solving a **regression** problem, where you want to predict continuous values for your data, you can use metrics such as **mean absolute error (MAE)**, **root mean square error (RMSE)**, **R-squared**, and **adjusted R-squared**. These metrics evaluate how close your model's predictions are to the true values of your data, and how well your model can explain the variance of your data. You can also use plots such as **residual plot** and **scatter plot** to visualize the error distribution and the correlation between your predictions and true values³⁴.

To learn more about these metrics and plots, and how to implement them in Python, you can check out these links:

- [Evaluate the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Keras](^1^)

- [6 Methods to Measure Performance of a Classification Model](^2^)

- [4 Best Metrics for Evaluating Regression Model Performance](^3^)

- [Predictive Performance Models Evaluation Metrics](^5^)

Source: 

(1) Evaluate the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Keras. https://machinelearningmastery.com/evaluate-performance-deep-learning-models-keras/.

(2) 6 Methods to Measure Performance of a Classification Model. https://insidelearningmachines.com/measure-performance-of-a-classification-model/.

(3) Evaluate Models Using Metrics | Machine Learning - Google Developers. https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/testing-debugging/metrics/metrics.

(4) 4 Best Metrics for Evaluating Regression Model Performance. https://www.aionlinecourse.com/tutorial/machine-learning/evaluating-regression-models-performance.

(5) Evaluate the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Keras. https://machinelearningmastery.com/evaluate-performance-deep-learning-models-keras/.

(6) 6 Methods to Measure Performance of a Classification Model. https://insidelearningmachines.com/measure-performance-of-a-classification-model/.

(7) Evaluate Models Using Metrics | Machine Learning - Google Developers. https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/testing-debugging/metrics/metrics.

(8) Predictive Performance Models Evaluation Metrics - InData Labs. https://indatalabs.com/blog/predictive-models-performance-evaluation-important.

(9) en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keras.

What is the difference between accuracy and precision?

Accuracy and precision are both forms of measurement that define how close you are to hitting a target or achieving a goal. Accuracy evaluates how close you are to the true value of the measurement, while precision shows how close the measured values are to one another¹.

For example, if you are shooting arrows at a bullseye, accuracy is how close your arrows are to the center of the target, and precision is how close your arrows are to each other. You can have high accuracy and low precision, low accuracy and high precision, or both high accuracy and high precision².

In math, science, and engineering, accuracy and precision are used to describe the quality and reliability of measurements. Accuracy reflects how close a measurement is to the actual or accepted value, while precision reflects how consistent or reproducible the measurements are. A measurement system can be accurate but not precise, precise but not accurate, or both accurate and precise³.

Source:

(1) What Is the Difference Between Accuracy and Precision? - ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/difference-between-accuracy-and-precision-609328.

(2) Accuracy and precision - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision.

(3) What's the difference between accuracy and precision? - Asana. https://asana.com/resources/accuracy-vs-precision.

(4) What Is the Difference Between Accuracy and Precision? - ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/difference-between-accuracy-and-precision-609328.

(5) Accuracy and precision - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision.

(6) What's the difference between accuracy and precision? - Asana. https://asana.com/resources/accuracy-vs-precision.

How do I calculate accuracy and precision for my model?

Accuracy and precision are two metrics that can be used to evaluate the performance of a classification model. Accuracy is the ratio of the number of correct predictions to the total number of predictions, while precision is the ratio of the number of true positives to the total number of positive predictions¹.

To calculate accuracy and precision for your model, you need to have the true labels and the predicted labels of your data. You can use the `sklearn.metrics` module in Python to compute these metrics easily. For example, you can use the following code:

```python

from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_score

# y_true is the list of true labels

# y_pred is the list of predicted labels

accuracy = accuracy_score(y_true, y_pred)

precision = precision_score(y_true, y_pred)

print("Accuracy:", accuracy)

print("Precision:", precision)

```

You can also use other metrics, such as recall, F1-score, ROC AUC, etc., depending on your problem and goals. You can find more information about these metrics and how to calculate them in the following links:

- [How to Calculate Precision, Recall, F1, and More for Deep Learning Models](^1^)

- [How to Calculate Precision, Recall, and F-Measure for Imbalanced Classification](^2^)

- [Model accuracy: how to determine it? - Data Science Stack Exchange](^4^)

Source: 

(1) How to Calculate Precision, Recall, F1, and More for Deep Learning Models. https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-calculate-precision-recall-f1-and-more-for-deep-learning-models/.

(2) How to Calculate Precision, Recall, F1, and More for Deep Learning Models. https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-calculate-precision-recall-f1-and-more-for-deep-learning-models/.

(3) How to Calculate Precision, Recall, and F-Measure for Imbalanced .... https://machinelearningmastery.com/precision-recall-and-f-measure-for-imbalanced-classification/.

(4) Model accuracy: how to determine it? - Data Science Stack Exchange. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/83961/model-accuracy-how-to-determine-it.

(5) How to Calculate Accuracy and Precision: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.thetechedvocate.org/how-to-calculate-accuracy-and-precision-a-comprehensive-guide/.

(6) How Compute Accuracy For Object Detection works - Esri. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/image-analyst/how-compute-accuracy-for-object-detection-works.htm.

💥💥💥 New year - new challenges - "OpenFoam project" part 2 (main differences between OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent)

 OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent are both software tools for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, but they have some key differences. Here are some of the main ones:


How do I choose between OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent?

Which one is better for simulating turbulence?

Simulating turbulence is a challenging task that depends on the type and complexity of the flow, the accuracy and stability of the numerical methods, and the suitability and validity of the turbulence models. Therefore, there is no definitive answer to which software is better for simulating turbulence, as it may vary from case to case. However, some general considerations are:

The best way to compare the software for simulating turbulence is to run the same problem with the same settings and mesh, and compare the results in terms of accuracy, convergence, and computational time. You can also consult the literature and the web for more information and examples of turbulence simulations with OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent12345

Which one is better for simualting Conjugate Heat Transfer ?

Conjugate heat transfer (CHT) is the process of heat transfer between a solid and a fluid, or between different solids, in contact with each other1. Simulating CHT requires solving the energy equation for both the fluid and the solid domains, and applying appropriate boundary conditions at the interface2.

Both OpenFoam and Ansys Fluent are capable of simulating CHT, but they have some differences in their approaches and features. Here are some of the main ones:

Tuesday, January 2, 2024

💥💥💥 New year - new challenges - "OpenFoam project" - part 1 (installation)

 There are different ways to install OpenFoam on Windows, depending on your preferences and needs. One option is to use the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL), which allows you to run Linux applications on Windows 10. Another option is to use a virtual machine (VM), such as VirtualBox, which creates a separate Linux environment on your Windows system. Here are some brief steps for each option:


Is threre possibilty to install OpenFoam directly on Windows ?

No, there is no possibility to install OpenFoam directly on Windows, as OpenFoam is a Linux-based software that requires a Linux environment to run. However, as I mentioned before, you can use WSL or VM to create a Linux environment on your Windows system and install OpenFoam there. These methods are well-documented and supported by the OpenFoam community123

How to install OpenFoam on Windows by the WSL method?

To install OpenFoam on Windows by the WSL method, you need to follow these steps:

What is the difference between WSL and VM?

Monday, January 1, 2024

💥💥💥 What is k-epsilon model in Ansys Fluent and what is used for ?

 The k-epsilon model is a type of turbulence model that is used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. It is based on two transport equations for the turbulence kinetic energy (k) and its dissipation rate (epsilon). The k-epsilon model can capture the effects of mean velocity gradients, buoyancy, compressibility, and heat and mass transfer on the turbulent flow. It is one of the most widely used turbulence models in engineering applications because of its robustness, economy, and reasonable accuracy for a wide range of flows¹².

Ansys Fluent is a software package that allows users to perform CFD simulations using various turbulence models, including the k-epsilon model. Ansys Fluent provides three variants of the k-epsilon model: the standard, the RNG, and the realizable k-epsilon models. Each variant has different methods of calculating the turbulent viscosity, the turbulent Prandtl numbers, and the generation and destruction terms in the epsilon equation³. The k-epsilon model in Ansys Fluent can be used for modeling internal and external flows, separated flows, jets, flows with high-pressure gradients, and flows through curved geometries⁴⁵.

Source:

(1) ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide - 33.3.3 Viscous Model Dialog Box - ENEA. https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/ug/node1022.htm.

(2) 12.4.1 Standard k Model Overview - University of Washington. https://courses.washington.edu/mengr544/handouts-10/Fluent-k-epsilon.pdf.

(3) ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide - 12.4 Steps in Using a Turbulence Model. https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/ug/node411.htm.

(4) Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model - Ansys .... https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/difference-between-k-epsilon-and-k-omega-turbulence-model/.

(5) k-epsilon and Laminar differrence - Ansys Learning Forum. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/k-epsilon-and-laminar-differrence/.

What are the limitations of k-epsilon model?

The k-epsilon model is a popular and widely used turbulence model, but it also has some limitations that affect its accuracy and applicability. Some of the limitations are:


- It assumes that the turbulence is isotropic, which means that the ratio between Reynolds stress and mean rate of deformation is the same in all directions. This is not true for flows with strong anisotropy, such as swirling, rotating, or curved flows²³.

- It requires a high Reynolds number, which means that the inertial forces are much larger than the viscous forces. This is not true for flows near the wall, where the viscous effects are important. Therefore, the k-epsilon model needs a near-wall treatment, such as wall functions or low-Reynolds number corrections, to account for the wall effects¹².

- It does not capture the effects of history and rapid distortion on the turbulence. This means that the model cannot handle flows with large adverse pressure gradients, boundary layer separation, or shock waves. Therefore, the k-epsilon model may under-predict the extent of recirculation zones or over-predict the turbulent kinetic energy at stagnation points¹⁴⁵.


These limitations can be overcome by using more advanced turbulence models, such as Reynolds stress models, large eddy simulation, or detached eddy simulation, which can account for the effects of anisotropy, compressibility, history, and distortion on the turbulence. However, these models are also more complex, computationally expensive, and sensitive to initial and boundary conditions. Therefore, the choice of the turbulence model depends on the trade-off between accuracy and efficiency for a given flow problem.

Source: 

(1) The k-ε Turbulence Model - COMSOL Multiphysics. https://doc.comsol.com/5.5/doc/com.comsol.help.cfd/cfd_ug_fluidflow_single.06.088.html.

(2) OpenFOAM: User Guide: k-epsilon. https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/guides/latest/doc/guide-turbulence-ras-k-epsilon.html.

(3) K-epsilon turbulence model - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-epsilon_turbulence_model.

(4) Validation and analysis of turbulence modeling in pipe elbow under .... https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40430-022-03899-9.

(5) Limitations and empirical extensions of the k-epsilon model as applied .... https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19840035309.

Is k-epsilon model good for low quality meshes ?

The k-epsilon model is not very suitable for low quality meshes, especially near the wall regions. This is because the k-epsilon model requires a high Reynolds number, which means that the inertial forces are much larger than the viscous forces. This is not true for flows near the wall, where the viscous effects are important. Therefore, the k-epsilon model needs a near-wall treatment, such as wall functions or low-Reynolds number corrections, to account for the wall effects¹². However, these treatments are sensitive to the mesh quality and resolution, and may not work well for coarse or skewed meshes³⁴.


A better alternative for low quality meshes is the k-omega model, which is more robust and accurate for near-wall flows. The k-omega model does not require a high Reynolds number, and can handle flows with large adverse pressure gradients, boundary layer separation, or shock waves. The k-omega model is also good in resolving internal flows, separated flows and jets and flows with high-pressure gradient and also internal flows through curved geometries³. However, the k-omega model may be more computationally expensive and sensitive to initial and boundary conditions than the k-epsilon model². Therefore, the choice of the turbulence model depends on the trade-off between accuracy and efficiency for a given flow problem.

Source: 

(1) K-epsilon Turbulence Model | Global Settings | SimScale. https://www.simscale.com/docs/simulation-setup/global-settings/k-epsilon/.

(2) K-epsilon turbulence model - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-epsilon_turbulence_model.

(3) Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/difference-between-k-epsilon-and-k-omega-turbulence-model/.

(4) k-epsilon model: which criteria do I have to meet for the near wall mesh?. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/k-epsilon-model-which-criteria-do-i-have-to-meet-for-the-near-wall-mesh/.

What is the difference between k-epsilon and k-omega models?

The k-epsilon and k-omega models are both types of turbulence models that are used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. They are based on two transport equations for the turbulence kinetic energy (k) and either its dissipation rate (epsilon) or its specific dissipation rate (omega). The main difference between them is that the k-epsilon model is more suitable for flow away from the wall, while the k-omega model is more accurate for near-wall flow regions¹².


The k-epsilon model assumes that the turbulence is isotropic, which means that the ratio between Reynolds stress and mean rate of deformation is the same in all directions. This is not true for flows with strong anisotropy, such as swirling, rotating, or curved flows. The k-epsilon model also requires a high Reynolds number, which means that the inertial forces are much larger than the viscous forces. This is not true for flows near the wall, where the viscous effects are important. Therefore, the k-epsilon model needs a near-wall treatment, such as wall functions or low-Reynolds number corrections, to account for the wall effects. However, these treatments are sensitive to the mesh quality and resolution, and may not work well for coarse or skewed meshes¹².


The k-omega model does not assume isotropy, and can handle flows with large adverse pressure gradients, boundary layer separation, or shock waves. The k-omega model does not require a high Reynolds number, and can resolve the viscous layer without wall functions. The k-omega model is also good in resolving internal flows, separated flows, jets, flows with high-pressure gradients, and flows through curved geometries¹³. However, the k-omega model may be more computationally expensive and sensitive to initial and boundary conditions than the k-epsilon model².


A common variant of the k-omega model is the SST (shear stress transport) model, which blends the k-epsilon and k-omega models to achieve the best of both worlds. The SST model uses the k-omega formulation in the near-wall region and switches to the k-epsilon formulation in the free-stream region. The SST model can capture the effects of mean velocity gradients, buoyancy, compressibility, and heat and mass transfer on the turbulent flow. The SST model is one of the most widely used turbulence models in engineering applications because of its robustness, economy, and reasonable accuracy for a wide range of flows¹⁴.

Source: 

(1) Which Turbulence Model Should I Choose for My CFD Application?. https://www.comsol.com/blogs/which-turbulence-model-should-choose-cfd-application/.

(2) Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models - CFD Online. https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/75554-use-k-epsilon-k-omega-models.html.

(3) Difference between K-epsilon and K-omega Turbulence Model. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/difference-between-k-epsilon-and-k-omega-turbulence-model/.

(4) What is the difference between k-epsilon and k-omega model .... https://rampfest-hudson.com/what-is-the-difference-between-k-epsilon-and-k-omega-model/.

(5) What is the difference between k-epsilon and K-Omega?. https://vidque.com/what-is-the-difference-between-k-epsilon-and-k-omega/.

Popular posts