Showing posts with label PARAMETERS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PARAMETERS. Show all posts

Monday, February 5, 2024

💥💥💥 How to prepare regression analysis in Ansys ?

 While Ansys isn't specifically designed for regression analysis, it can be used for tasks leading up to and potentially supporting it. Here's how you can approach regression analysis using Ansys:


1. Define your problem and data:

  • What are you trying to predict or understand? Identify the dependent variable (output) and independent variables (inputs).

  • Ensure you have enough data points for meaningful analysis. Ansys simulations can generate this data.

2. Perform simulations in Ansys:

  • Use the appropriate Ansys module (e.g., Mechanical, Fluent) to create your model and run simulations.

  • Vary the independent variables according to your desired regression analysis scope. Design of Experiments (DOE) tools in Ansys can help automate this process.

3. Extract relevant data:

  • From the simulations, extract the values of your dependent and independent variables.

  • Organize this data into a table or spreadsheet format suitable for regression analysis.

4. Use external tools for regression analysis:

  • Ansys itself doesn't have built-in regression analysis capabilities.

  • Export your data to dedicated statistical software like Python, R, Excel, or specialized engineering analysis tools.

5. Perform regression analysis in the chosen tool:

  • Follow the specific instructions for your chosen tool. Common methods include linear regression, non-linear regression, and polynomial regression.

  • Interpret the results, including R-squared value, p-values, and regression coefficients.

Additional considerations:

  • Complexity: Depending on your problem and desired regression model, you might need advanced statistical knowledge or specialized software.

  • Assumptions: Ensure your data meets the assumptions of the chosen regression method (e.g., normality, linearity).

  • Validation: Validate your regression model by checking its accuracy on unseen data.

While Ansys itself doesn't handle regression analysis directly, it can be a valuable tool for generating simulation data to be used in external software for further analysis. Remember to choose the appropriate tools and methods based on your specific problem and data characteristics.

What are differences between linear , non-linear and polynomial regression?

The key differences between linear, non-linear, and polynomial regression lie in the relationship they
model between your independent and dependent variables:

Linear Regression:

  • Relationship: Assumes a straight line relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

  • Equation: Expressed as y = mx + b, where y is the dependent variable, x is the independent variable, m is the slope, and b is the y-intercept.

  • Strengths: Simple to interpret, computationally efficient, good for initial explorations.

  • Weaknesses: Limited to modeling linear relationships, can't capture complex, curved patterns.

Non-Linear Regression:

  • Relationship: Models any relationship between variables, not just straight lines.

  • Equation: Can take various forms depending on the specific relationship being modeled, but not a simple straight line equation.

  • Strengths: More flexible, can capture complex relationships.

  • Weaknesses: More complex to interpret and fit, requires more data, more prone to overfitting.

Polynomial Regression:

  • Relationship: A special case of non-linear regression where the relationship is modeled using polynomials (equations with terms like x^2, x^3, etc.).

  • Equation: Takes the form y = a0 + a1*x + a2*x^2 + ..., where a are coefficients.

  • Strengths: Can capture various curved relationships by adjusting the polynomial degree.

  • Weaknesses: Similar to non-linear regression, prone to overfitting, choosing the right polynomial degree can be challenging.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences:



Choosing the right type:

The best choice depends on the nature of your data and the relationship you expect between your variables:

  • Use linear regression if you have a clear linear relationship or as a starting point

  • for exploration.

  • Use non-linear regression if you suspect a more complex, non-linear relationship.

  • Use polynomial regression cautiously, only if you have a strong reason to believe the relationship is curved and you can choose the right polynomial degree to avoid overfitting.

Remember, these are general guidelines, and the best approach might involve trying different methods and comparing their performance on your specific data.

What types of Design Of Experiments are available in Ansys ?

Ansys offers a variety of Design of Experiments (DOE) types through its DesignXplorer module. These methods cater to different needs and modeling complexities, allowing you to efficiently explore your design space and identify optimal solutions. Here's an overview of some key DOE types in Ansys:

Screening Designs:

  • Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS): Efficiently explores the design space with minimal simulations. Good for identifying important factors and prioritizing further analysis.

  • Plackett-Burman Designs: Useful for screening many factors with a limited number of simulations.

Response Surface Designs:

  • Central Composite Design (CCD): Provides accurate estimates of linear, quadratic, and interaction effects between factors. Widely used for building response surfaces and optimization.

  • Box-Behnken Design: Rotatable design suitable for exploring quadratic relationships without axial points, useful when constraints limit design space.

Space-Filling Designs:

  • Optimal Space-Filling Designs (OSF): Fills the design space uniformly, ensuring good coverage even for complex geometries. Useful for global exploration and identifying promising regions.

  • Uniform Designs: Offer maximum spread of points within the design space, suitable for exploring highly nonlinear relationships.

Advanced Designs:

  • Adaptive Sparse Grids: Progressively refine the design space in areas of interest, efficient for high-dimensional problems.

  • Kriging: Builds a surrogate model based on existing simulations, enabling predictions at unsampled points without additional simulations.

Additional factors to consider when choosing a DOE type:

  • Number of factors: Some designs are better suited for handling many factors than others.

  • Desired level of accuracy: Response surface designs provide more accurate information but require more simulations.

  • Computational budget: Consider the number of simulations each design requires and your available resources.

  • Type of relationship: Choose a design that can capture the expected relationship between factors (linear, quadratic, etc.).

It's crucial to understand your specific needs and the characteristics of your problem before selecting a DOE type. Consulting the Ansys DesignXplorer documentation or seeking expert guidance can help you choose the most appropriate method for your analysis.


Monday, January 22, 2024

💥💥💥 Which software is better to model centrifugal pump, Ansys Fluent or CFX?

According to the Ansys Learning Forum¹, both CFX and Fluent are good CFD solvers, but they have some differences in their approaches, capabilities, and applications. Some of the main differences are:

- Fluent can handle 2D meshes and polyhedral meshes, while CFX can only handle 3D meshes with tetra and hexa topologies.

- Fluent uses a cell-centered method, while CFX uses a vertex-centered method.

- Fluent needs UDFs for customization, while CFX uses CEL (CFX Expression Language) which is also compatible with CFD-Post.

- Fluent has more tutorials and updates, while CFX has limited resources and development.

- Fluent can use GPU acceleration, while CFX cannot.

For non-Newtonian fluids, boundary layer effects are important. The CFX immersed solid method does not consider boundary layer effects, so it may not be reliable. A Fluent or CFX remeshing method is recommended².

CFX has been proven to be effective for turbomachinery problems, such as centrifugal pumps. Fluent is preferred for high Mach number flows¹.

You can also watch a video tutorial on how to model a centrifugal pump using CFX³.

Source:

(1) What are the differences between CFX and Fluent? - Ansys Learning Forum. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/what-are-the-differences-between-cfx-and-fluent/.

(2) Is CFX or Fluent better for modeling a gear pump that is handling a non .... https://ansyskm.ansys.com/forums/topic/is-cfx-or-fluent-better-for-modeling-a-gear-pump-that-is-handling-a-non-newtonian-fluid/.

(3) #ANSYS CFX - Centrifugal Pump - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEfcIT4dt7U.

(4) http://cfd.ninja/.

More info about turbomachinery capabilities in Ansys CFX

CFX is a CFD software that specializes in turbomachinery applications, such as gas turbines, pumps, fans, compressors, and wind turbines. CFX has several features that make it suitable for these types of problems, such as:

- Streamlined turbo setup and post-processing, which allows you to easily define the geometry, boundary conditions, and performance parameters of your turbomachinery model¹.

- Rotor-stator interaction models, which account for the effects of relative motion and fluid exchange between rotating and stationary components².

- Transient blade row methods, which enable you to simulate unsteady phenomena such as blade flutter, stall, and surge with reduced computational cost².

- Highly scalable high-performance computing, which helps you speed up simulations and handle large and complex models².

You can also read some best practice guidelines for turbomachinery CFD³ or watch a video tutorial on how to model a centrifugal pump using CFX.

Source:

(1) Fluid Simulation for Turbomachinery | Ansys CFX - SimuTech Group. https://simutechgroup.com/ansys-software/fluids/ansys-cfx/.

(2) Ansys CFX | Industry-Leading CFD Software. https://www.ansys.com/products/fluids/ansys-cfx.

(3) Best practice guidelines for turbomachinery CFD. https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Best_practice_guidelines_for_turbomachinery_CFD.

Can you recommend some books or courses on turbomachinery modeling?

Some books that you may find useful are:

- Principles of Turbomachinery, 2nd Edition by Seppo A. Korpela¹. This book covers the theory and applications of turbomachinery, including steam turbines, gas turbines, hydraulic turbines, wind turbines, compressors, and pumps. It also provides examples and exercises for each chapter.

- Turbomachinery: Fundamentals, Selection and Preliminary Design by Marco Gambini and Michela Vellini². This book presents a selection of preliminary sizing procedures for turbomachinery, using geometric correlations and losses models. It also examines all types of turbomachines, such as axial and radial turbines, axial and centrifugal compressors, and centrifugal pumps.

- Fundamentals of Turbomachinery by William W. Peng³. This book provides a comprehensive introduction to turbomachines and their applications, with up-to-date coverage of all types of turbomachinery. It also includes numerous examples, problems, and case studies.


Some courses that you may find helpful are:

- Introduction to Turbomachinery by MIT OpenCourseWare. This course introduces the basic concepts and principles of turbomachinery, such as thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, performance analysis, and design. It also covers various types of turbomachines, such as axial and radial flow turbines and compressors, and pumps and fans.

- Turbomachinery Aerodynamics by edX. This course covers the aerodynamics of turbomachinery, such as flow phenomena, losses, blade design, and optimization. It also includes applications to gas turbines, steam turbines, wind turbines, and propellers.

- Turbomachinery and Propulsion by Coursera. This course covers the fundamentals of turbomachinery and propulsion, such as thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, performance, and efficiency. It also includes topics such as combustion, turbojets, turbofans, turboprops, and rockets.

Source:

(1) Principles of Turbomachinery, 2nd Edition | Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Principles+of+Turbomachinery%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119518099.

(2) Turbomachinery: Fundamentals, Selection and Preliminary Design .... https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-51299-6.

(3) Fundamentals of Turbomachinery | Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Fundamentals+of+Turbomachinery-p-9780470124222.

Monday, January 15, 2024

💥💥💥 How to draw and calculate centrifugal pump in Ansys Fluent?

A centrifugal pump is a device that uses the rotation of an impeller to increase the pressure and flow rate of a fluid. Ansys Fluent is a software that can simulate the fluid dynamics and performance of a centrifugal pump using various methods and models1.


To draw and calculate a centrifugal pump in Ansys Fluent, you will need to follow these general steps:

For more details and examples, you can watch this video tutorial1 or refer to this forum post2 or this online discussion4

How to draw (general rulez) centrifugal pump?

A centrifugal pump consists of a casing, an impeller, and a shaft. The casing is the outer part that encloses the fluid and directs it to the outlet. The impeller is the rotating part that transfers energy to the fluid and increases its pressure and velocity. The shaft is the part that connects the impeller to the motor and transmits the torque.

To draw the geometry of a centrifugal pump, you need to follow these steps:

  • Draw a circle with the diameter of the inlet of the pump. This will be the base of the casing.
  • Draw a spiral curve that starts from the inlet circle and ends at the outlet of the pump. This will be the shape of the casing. The spiral curve should have a constant pitch and a variable radius that increases with the angle. The pitch and the radius depend on the design specifications of the pump.
  • Draw another circle with the diameter of the outlet of the pump. This will be the top of the casing.
  • Extrude the spiral curve between the inlet and outlet circles to create the casing volume. You can use the coil tool with the spiral option to do this easily1.
  • Draw a circle with the diameter of the impeller inside the casing. This will be the base of the impeller.
  • Draw a series of blades on the impeller circle. The blades should have a curved shape that follows the direction of the fluid flow. The number, shape, and angle of the blades depend on the design specifications of the pump.
  • Extrude the blades along the impeller circle to create the impeller volume. You can use the sweep tool to do this easily2.
  • Draw a cylinder with the diameter of the shaft inside the impeller. This will be the base of the shaft.
  • Extrude the shaft cylinder to the desired length. You can use the extrude tool to do this easily2.

You have now drawn the geometry of a centrifugal pump. You can use any CAD software to do this, such as Ansys DesignModeler, Ansys SpaceClaim, or Inventor3

What are some common errors when modeling a centrifugal pump in Ansys Fluent?

Some common errors when modeling a centrifugal pump in Ansys Fluent are:

To troubleshoot these errors, you can check your boundary conditions, refine your mesh, use appropriate physical models, and try different solver settings12

What are some best practices for modeling pumps in Ansys Fluent?

Some best practices for modeling pumps in Ansys Fluent are:

For more details and examples, you can watch this video tutorial3 . 

What are common mistakes in centrifugal pump design?

Some common mistakes in centrifugal pump design are:

Tuesday, January 9, 2024

💥💥💥 How to define free inlet and outlet in Ansys Fluent?

 A free inlet is a type of boundary condition that allows the fluid to enter or exit the domain depending on the pressure difference. It is suitable for external or unconfined flows, such as wind tunnel simulations or open channel flows.

To define a free inlet in Ansys Fluent, you can use the pressure inlet boundary condition and set the total (stagnation) pressure to zero. This will allow the fluid to flow in or out of the domain depending on the local pressure gradient. You will also need to specify the total temperature, turbulence parameters, and other scalar properties of the flow at the inlet. For more details, please refer to this guide.

Alternatively, you can use the velocity inlet boundary condition and set the velocity magnitude to zero. This will also allow the fluid to flow in or out of the domain depending on the pressure difference. However, you will need to use a user-defined function (UDF) to update the velocity direction at each time step, based on the local flow direction. For more information, please see this forum post.

How to define free outlet in Ansys Fluent?

A free outlet is a type of boundary condition that allows the fluid to exit the domain freely without any restriction. It is suitable for external or unconfined flows, such as jet flows or exhaust flows.

To define a free outlet in Ansys Fluent, you can use the pressure outlet boundary condition and set the gauge pressure to zero. This will allow the fluid to flow out of the domain based on the local pressure gradient. You will also need to specify the backflow properties of the flow at the outlet, such as temperature, turbulence parameters, and other scalar quantities. For more details, please refer to this guide.

Alternatively, you can use the outflow boundary condition and set the mass flow rate to zero. This will also allow the fluid to flow out of the domain without any restriction. However, you will need to ensure that there is no reverse flow at the outlet, as the outflow boundary condition does not account for backflow. For more information, please see this forum post.

What is the difference between pressure outlet and outflow?

The difference between pressure outlet and outflow boundary conditions in Ansys Fluent is that:

  • Pressure outlet allows you to specify the static (gauge) pressure at the outlet, and the software will calculate the mass flow rate based on the pressure gradient. You also need to define the backflow properties in case of reverse flow at the outlet. This boundary condition is suitable for cases where the outlet pressure is known or important for the simulation results.
  • Outflow assumes a zero diffusion flux for all flow variables except the pressure, and the software will calculate the pressure at the outlet based on the mass conservation. You do not need to define the backflow properties, but you need to ensure that there is no reverse flow at the outlet. This boundary condition is suitable for cases where the flow is fully developed and the outlet pressure is not known or important for the simulation results.

For more information, please refer to this guide or this forum post.

What is the difference between pressure inlet and velocity inlet?

The difference between pressure inlet and velocity inlet boundary conditions in Ansys Fluent is that:

For more information, please refer to this guide or this forum post.

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

💥💥💥 How to adjust the curve - validations methods

Curve adjustment is the process of modifying a model's parameters to improve its fit to the data. Validation is the process of evaluating a model's performance on a separate set of data that was not used for training. Validation methods are the techniques used to split the data into training and validation sets, and to measure the model's accuracy, precision, recall, etc.

One common validation method is the **validation curve**, which plots the training and validation scores for different values of a single hyperparameter. This can help you find the optimal value of the hyperparameter that minimizes the bias and variance of the model. You can use the `validation_curve` function from the `sklearn.model_selection` module to generate validation curves for different estimators¹².

Another validation method is the **learning curve**, which plots the training and validation scores for different sizes of the training set. This can help you determine if the model benefits from more training data, or if it suffers from overfitting or underfitting. You can use the `learning_curve` function from the `sklearn.model_selection` module to generate learning curves for different estimators¹.

There are other validation methods, such as cross-validation, bootstrap, hold-out, etc., that you can use depending on your data and model. You can find more information about them in the [User Guide](^1^) and the [Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide](^3^).

Source: 

(1) 3.4. Validation curves: plotting scores to evaluate models. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/learning_curve.html.

(2) sklearn.model_selection.validation_curve - scikit-learn. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.model_selection.validation_curve.html.

(3) 3.4. Validation curves: plotting scores to evaluate models. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/learning_curve.html.

(4) Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide | Built In. https://builtin.com/data-science/model-validation-test.

(5) Validation Curve - GeeksforGeeks. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/validation-curve/.

(6) Validation – Adjustment of NIR Calibrations | PerkinElmer Blog. https://blog.perkinelmer.com/posts/validation-adjustment-of-nir-calibrations/.

**Cross-validation** is a method that divides your data into **k** equal and non-overlapping subsets, called **folds**. Then, it trains your model on **k-1** folds, and tests it on the remaining fold. This process is repeated **k** times, so that each fold is used as the test set once. The average of the test scores across the **k** folds is the final performance measure of your model¹.

**Bootstrap** is a method that samples your data **with replacement**, meaning that the same data point can be selected more than once. It creates **B** new datasets, each with the same size as the original dataset, but with some data points repeated and some omitted. Then, it trains your model on each bootstrap dataset, and tests it on the original dataset. The average of the test scores across the **B** bootstrap datasets is the final performance measure of your model².

**Hold-out** is a method that splits your data into two parts: a **training set** and a **validation set**. The training set is used to fit your model, and the validation set is used to evaluate its performance. The size of the validation set is usually a fixed proportion of the original dataset, such as 20% or 30%. The performance measure of your model is the test score on the validation set³.

Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the size and characteristics of your data, and the complexity and variability of your model. You can find more information about them in the following links:

- [What is the difference between bootstrapping and cross-validation?](^1^)

- [4 Cross Validation Methods | Introduction to Applied Machine Learning](^2^)

- [Hold-out vs. Cross-validation in Machine Learning](^5^)

Source:

(1) What is the difference between bootstrapping and cross-validation?. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/32264/what-is-the-difference-between-bootstrapping-and-cross-validation.

(2) 4 Cross Validation Methods | Introduction to Applied Machine Learning. https://dionysus.psych.wisc.edu/iaml_2020/unit-04.html.

(3) Are K-Fold Cross Validation , Bootstrap ,Out of Bag fundamentally same?. https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/206807/are-k-fold-cross-validation-bootstrap-out-of-bag-fundamentally-same.

(4) What is the difference between bootstrapping and cross-validation?. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/32264/what-is-the-difference-between-bootstrapping-and-cross-validation.

(5) 4 Cross Validation Methods | Introduction to Applied Machine Learning. https://dionysus.psych.wisc.edu/iaml_2020/unit-04.html.

(6) Hold-out vs. Cross-validation in Machine Learning - Medium. https://medium.com/@jaz1/holdout-vs-cross-validation-in-machine-learning-7637112d3f8f.

(7) Bootstrapping vs Cross-Validation - Doc Zamora's ML & AI. https://www.doczamora.com/bootstrapping-vs-cross-validation.

(8) en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-validation_(statistics).

How do I choose the best validation method for my model?

Choosing the best validation method for your model depends on several factors, such as the size and characteristics of your data, the complexity and variability of your model, and the trade-off between bias and variance. 😊

There is no definitive answer to this question, as different validation methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, some general guidelines are:

- If your data is large and representative, you can use a simple **hold-out** method, where you split your data into a training set and a validation set, and use the validation set to evaluate your model's performance⁴.

- If your data is small or imbalanced, you can use a **cross-validation** method, where you divide your data into k folds, and use each fold as a validation set once, while using the rest as a training set. This way, you can use all your data for both training and validation, and reduce the variance of your model's performance¹.

- If your data is noisy or has high variance, you can use a **bootstrap** method, where you sample your data with replacement, and create new datasets that have the same size as the original dataset. Then, you can train and test your model on each bootstrap dataset, and average the performance across them. This way, you can reduce the bias of your model's performance².

You can also combine different validation methods, such as using cross-validation with hold-out, or bootstrap with cross-validation, to get more robust estimates of your model's performance.


To learn more about these validation methods, you can check out these links:

- [Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide](^1^)

- [The Ultimate Guide to Evaluation and Selection of Models in ML](^2^)

- [choosing model based on last or best iteration on validation set](^3^)

- [How To Choose The Right Test Options When Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms](^4^)

Source: 

(1) How To Choose The Right Test Options When Evaluating Machine Learning .... https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-choose-the-right-test-options-when-evaluating-machine-learning-algorithms/.

(2) Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide | Built In. https://builtin.com/data-science/model-validation-test.

(3) The Ultimate Guide to Evaluation and Selection of Models in ML - neptune.ai. https://neptune.ai/blog/ml-model-evaluation-and-selection.

(4) Model Validation and Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide | Built In. https://builtin.com/data-science/model-validation-test.

(5) The Ultimate Guide to Evaluation and Selection of Models in ML - neptune.ai. https://neptune.ai/blog/ml-model-evaluation-and-selection.

(6) choosing model based on last or best iteration on validation set. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/72002/choosing-model-based-on-last-or-best-iteration-on-validation-set.

(7) How To Choose The Right Test Options When Evaluating Machine Learning .... https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-choose-the-right-test-options-when-evaluating-machine-learning-algorithms/.

How do I measure the performance of my model?

There are different ways to measure the performance of your model, depending on the type of problem you are solving and the metrics you are interested in. 😊

For example, if you are solving a **classification** problem, where you want to predict discrete labels for your data, you can use metrics such as **accuracy**, **precision**, **recall**, and **F1 score**. These metrics evaluate how well your model can correctly identify the true classes of your data, and avoid false positives and false negatives. You can also use plots such as **ROC curve** and **confusion matrix** to visualize the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, and the distribution of errors across classes¹².

If you are solving a **regression** problem, where you want to predict continuous values for your data, you can use metrics such as **mean absolute error (MAE)**, **root mean square error (RMSE)**, **R-squared**, and **adjusted R-squared**. These metrics evaluate how close your model's predictions are to the true values of your data, and how well your model can explain the variance of your data. You can also use plots such as **residual plot** and **scatter plot** to visualize the error distribution and the correlation between your predictions and true values³⁴.

To learn more about these metrics and plots, and how to implement them in Python, you can check out these links:

- [Evaluate the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Keras](^1^)

- [6 Methods to Measure Performance of a Classification Model](^2^)

- [4 Best Metrics for Evaluating Regression Model Performance](^3^)

- [Predictive Performance Models Evaluation Metrics](^5^)

Source: 

(1) Evaluate the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Keras. https://machinelearningmastery.com/evaluate-performance-deep-learning-models-keras/.

(2) 6 Methods to Measure Performance of a Classification Model. https://insidelearningmachines.com/measure-performance-of-a-classification-model/.

(3) Evaluate Models Using Metrics | Machine Learning - Google Developers. https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/testing-debugging/metrics/metrics.

(4) 4 Best Metrics for Evaluating Regression Model Performance. https://www.aionlinecourse.com/tutorial/machine-learning/evaluating-regression-models-performance.

(5) Evaluate the Performance of Deep Learning Models in Keras. https://machinelearningmastery.com/evaluate-performance-deep-learning-models-keras/.

(6) 6 Methods to Measure Performance of a Classification Model. https://insidelearningmachines.com/measure-performance-of-a-classification-model/.

(7) Evaluate Models Using Metrics | Machine Learning - Google Developers. https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/testing-debugging/metrics/metrics.

(8) Predictive Performance Models Evaluation Metrics - InData Labs. https://indatalabs.com/blog/predictive-models-performance-evaluation-important.

(9) en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keras.

What is the difference between accuracy and precision?

Accuracy and precision are both forms of measurement that define how close you are to hitting a target or achieving a goal. Accuracy evaluates how close you are to the true value of the measurement, while precision shows how close the measured values are to one another¹.

For example, if you are shooting arrows at a bullseye, accuracy is how close your arrows are to the center of the target, and precision is how close your arrows are to each other. You can have high accuracy and low precision, low accuracy and high precision, or both high accuracy and high precision².

In math, science, and engineering, accuracy and precision are used to describe the quality and reliability of measurements. Accuracy reflects how close a measurement is to the actual or accepted value, while precision reflects how consistent or reproducible the measurements are. A measurement system can be accurate but not precise, precise but not accurate, or both accurate and precise³.

Source:

(1) What Is the Difference Between Accuracy and Precision? - ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/difference-between-accuracy-and-precision-609328.

(2) Accuracy and precision - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision.

(3) What's the difference between accuracy and precision? - Asana. https://asana.com/resources/accuracy-vs-precision.

(4) What Is the Difference Between Accuracy and Precision? - ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/difference-between-accuracy-and-precision-609328.

(5) Accuracy and precision - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision.

(6) What's the difference between accuracy and precision? - Asana. https://asana.com/resources/accuracy-vs-precision.

How do I calculate accuracy and precision for my model?

Accuracy and precision are two metrics that can be used to evaluate the performance of a classification model. Accuracy is the ratio of the number of correct predictions to the total number of predictions, while precision is the ratio of the number of true positives to the total number of positive predictions¹.

To calculate accuracy and precision for your model, you need to have the true labels and the predicted labels of your data. You can use the `sklearn.metrics` module in Python to compute these metrics easily. For example, you can use the following code:

```python

from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score, precision_score

# y_true is the list of true labels

# y_pred is the list of predicted labels

accuracy = accuracy_score(y_true, y_pred)

precision = precision_score(y_true, y_pred)

print("Accuracy:", accuracy)

print("Precision:", precision)

```

You can also use other metrics, such as recall, F1-score, ROC AUC, etc., depending on your problem and goals. You can find more information about these metrics and how to calculate them in the following links:

- [How to Calculate Precision, Recall, F1, and More for Deep Learning Models](^1^)

- [How to Calculate Precision, Recall, and F-Measure for Imbalanced Classification](^2^)

- [Model accuracy: how to determine it? - Data Science Stack Exchange](^4^)

Source: 

(1) How to Calculate Precision, Recall, F1, and More for Deep Learning Models. https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-calculate-precision-recall-f1-and-more-for-deep-learning-models/.

(2) How to Calculate Precision, Recall, F1, and More for Deep Learning Models. https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-calculate-precision-recall-f1-and-more-for-deep-learning-models/.

(3) How to Calculate Precision, Recall, and F-Measure for Imbalanced .... https://machinelearningmastery.com/precision-recall-and-f-measure-for-imbalanced-classification/.

(4) Model accuracy: how to determine it? - Data Science Stack Exchange. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/83961/model-accuracy-how-to-determine-it.

(5) How to Calculate Accuracy and Precision: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.thetechedvocate.org/how-to-calculate-accuracy-and-precision-a-comprehensive-guide/.

(6) How Compute Accuracy For Object Detection works - Esri. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/image-analyst/how-compute-accuracy-for-object-detection-works.htm.

Popular posts