Sunday, December 31, 2023

šŸŽ… šŸŽ… šŸŽ… The story of Santa Claus who, with a hangover on New Year's Eve, had to test Ansys Mechanical a bit

 Santa Claus had a wild night on New Year's Eve. He drank too much eggnog, danced with the elves, and sang karaoke with Rudolph. He woke up the next morning with a hangover and a terrible headache. He groaned and reached for his phone, hoping to check his messages and go back to sleep.

But he was in for a rude awakening. He had received an urgent email from Ansys, the company that provided him with the software for designing his sleigh and toys. They wanted him to test their new product, Ansys Mechanical, a finite element analysis (FEA) software for structural engineering. They said it was a great opportunity for him to improve his designs and optimize his performance.

Santa Claus was not in the mood for this. He hated learning new software, especially when he had a headache. He wished he could just stick to his old methods, but he knew he had to keep up with the times. He decided to give it a try, hoping it would be easy and intuitive.

He downloaded Ansys Mechanical and opened it on his laptop. He was greeted by a user interface that looked complicated and confusing. He saw a lot of buttons, menus, and icons, but he had no idea what they did. He looked for a tutorial or a help guide, but he couldn't find any. He felt frustrated and overwhelmed.

He decided to start with something simple. He wanted to model a toy car and see how it would behave under different loads and conditions. He imported a CAD model of the car and tried to mesh it. He clicked on the mesh button and waited for the results. He expected to see a nice and smooth mesh, but he was shocked by what he saw. The mesh was coarse and distorted, with a lot of poor elements and gaps. He didn't know what went wrong or how to fix it.

He tried to adjust the mesh settings, but he only made it worse. He tried to apply boundary conditions and loads, but he got a lot of errors and warnings. He tried to run the analysis, but he got a message saying that the solution was not converged. He tried to view the results, but he got a blank screen. He tried to use the post-processing tools, but he didn't understand what they meant.

He spent hours trying to figure out how to use Ansys Mechanical, but he only got more frustrated and angry. He felt like he was wasting his time and energy. He cursed and slammed his laptop shut. He decided to give up on Ansys Mechanical and go back to his old software. He thought it was too complicated and difficult for him. He wondered why Ansys wanted him to use it in the first place.

He didn't realize that Ansys Mechanical was actually a powerful and versatile tool that could help him solve complex structural engineering problems and make better, faster design decisions. He didn't know that it had a dynamic and integrated platform that could connect with other physics for even greater fidelity. He didn't know that it had a persistent, dependable, and accurate solver technology that could handle linear and nonlinear, static and dynamic, and thermal and acoustic analyses. He didn't know that it had a lot of features and capabilities that could help him with advanced materials modeling, vibration, coupled field, explicit, acoustics, crack and fracture, structural optimization, fatigue life, and more.

He also didn't know that Ansys Mechanical had a lot of resources and events that could help him learn and use it effectively. He didn't know that he could access online courses, webinars, blogs, forums, and support communities that could provide him with guidance and tips. He didn't know that he could find a lot of tutorials, examples, and documentation that could show him how to use the software step by step. He didn't know that he could contact Ansys experts and engineers who could answer his questions and solve his problems.

Santa Claus missed a great opportunity to improve his skills and designs with Ansys Mechanical. He could have learned a lot and had a lot of fun with it. He could have made his sleigh and toys more efficient, reliable, and safe. He could have delivered more joy and happiness to the children of the world.

But he didn't. He chose to stay in his comfort zone and ignore the new possibilities. He was too stubborn and lazy to try something new. He was too proud and arrogant to ask for help. He was too drunk and hungover to think clearly.

He regretted his decision later, when he realized what he had missed. He wished he had given Ansys Mechanical a chance. He wished he had been more open-minded and curious. He wished he had been more smart and brave.

But it was too late. He had lost his chance. He had lost his edge. He had lost his magic.

The end.

šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„HAPPY AND HEALTHY NEW YEAR !!!šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„

Saturday, December 30, 2023

šŸŽ… šŸŽ… šŸŽ… What are the main differences between Ansys Fluent and CFX ?

Ansys Fluent and CFX are both powerful computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers, but they have some differences in their features, capabilities, and applications. Here are some of the main differences between them:

- Fluent uses a cell-centered approach while CFX uses a vertex-centered approach. This means that Fluent can handle more complex mesh topologies, such as polyhedral and cutcell meshes, while CFX is limited to tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes¹².

- Fluent has post-processing capabilities of its own while CFX needs a dedicated post-processor, such as CFD-Post¹². Fluent also has more options for mesh adaption and simulation acceleration with a GPU².

- CFX has a built-in expression language (CEL) that allows users to define algebraic equations and monitor them during the run¹². Fluent requires user-defined functions (UDFs) for customization, which can be more challenging for beginners¹.

- CFX is more suitable for turbomachinery applications, as it has specialized features for rotating machinery, such as frozen rotor and transient blade row models²³. Fluent is more preferred for high Mach number flows, such as supersonic and hypersonic flows².

Source: 

(1) What are the differences between CFX and Fluent? - Ansys Learning Forum. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/what-are-the-differences-between-cfx-and-fluent/.

(2) Compare Ansys CFX vs. Ansys Fluent | G2. https://www.g2.com/compare/ansys-cfx-vs-ansys-fluent.

(3) Reply To: What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/reply/58903/.

(4) What are the differences between CFX and Fluent? - Ansys Learning Forum. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/what-are-the-differences-between-cfx-and-fluent/.

(5) Compare Ansys CFX vs. Ansys Fluent | G2. https://www.g2.com/compare/ansys-cfx-vs-ansys-fluent.

(6) Reply To: What are the differences between CFX and Fluent?. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/reply/58903/.

(7) Getty Images. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/in-this-photo-illustration-the-ansys-logo-seen-displayed-on-news-photo/1212478964. 

Which one is more popular in industry?

That's a good question, but it's not easy to answer. The popularity of Ansys Fluent and CFX may depend on the industry, the region, the application, and the preference of the users. According to some sources, Fluent is more widely used than CFX in general, especially in the aerospace, automotive, and chemical industries¹². However, CFX has a strong presence in the power generation and turbomachinery sectors¹³. Ultimately, both solvers have their strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice may depend on the specific problem and the user's experience.

Source: 

(1) What are the differences between CFX and Fluent? - Ansys Learning Forum. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/what-are-the-differences-between-cfx-and-fluent/.

(2) Ansys CFX or Ansys Fluent : r/CFD - Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/CFD/comments/yp3vf0/ansys_cfx_or_ansys_fluent/.

(3) Compare Ansys CFX vs. Ansys Fluent | G2. https://www.g2.com/compare/ansys-cfx-vs-ansys-fluent.

Which one  is more accurate on Conjugate Heat Transfer analysis? Ansys Fluent or CFX?

Conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis is a type of simulation that models the heat transfer within and between fluids and solids¹. The accuracy of CHT analysis depends on many factors, such as the mesh quality, the boundary conditions, the solver settings, and the physical models²³. Therefore, it is not possible to say which solver, Ansys Fluent or CFX, is more accurate in general, as the results may vary depending on the specific problem and the user's expertise.

However, some studies have compared the performance of Fluent and CFX for different CHT applications, such as liquid-cooled IGBT assemblies⁴, heat exchangers⁵, and turbomachinery. These studies have shown that both solvers can produce similar results, but they may have different advantages and disadvantages in terms of computational efficiency, convergence behavior, and ease of use. For example, Fluent may have more options for mesh adaption and acceleration with a GPU², while CFX may have more features for rotating machinery and expression language³.

Therefore, the best way to determine which solver is more accurate for your CHT analysis is to try both of them and compare the results with experimental data or analytical solutions, if available. You can also consult the Ansys documentation and forums for more guidance and tips on how to use Fluent and CFX for CHT analysis. šŸ˜Š

Source:

(1) How does the "Loosely Coupled Conjugate Heat Transfer" function work .... https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/how-does-the-loosely-coupled-conjugate-heat-transfer-function-work/.

(2) THERMAL ANALYSIS/CONJUGATE HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN ANSYS CFX THERMAL .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx39uFHtHbs.

(3) CHT analysis using Fluent Solver | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/conjugate-heat-transfer/lessons/cht-analysis-of-liquid-cooled-igbt-assembly/topic/part-3-using-fluent-solver/.

(4) CHT Analysis in Ansys Discovery | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/conjugate-heat-transfer/.

(5) Ansys Fluent Heat Transfer Modeling | Ansys Training. https://www.ansys.com/training-center/course-catalog/fluids/ansys-fluent-heat-transfer-modeling.

(6) CHT Analysis in Ansys Discovery | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/conjugate-heat-transfer/.

(7) Ansys Fluent Heat Transfer Modeling | Ansys Training. https://www.ansys.com/training-center/course-catalog/fluids/ansys-fluent-heat-transfer-modeling.

(8) CHT analysis using Fluent Solver | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/conjugate-heat-transfer/lessons/cht-analysis-of-liquid-cooled-igbt-assembly/topic/part-3-using-fluent-solver/.

(9) CHT analysis using Fluent Solver | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/conjugate-heat-transfer/lessons/cht-analysis-of-liquid-cooled-igbt-assembly/topic/part-3-using-fluent-solver/.

What is the difference between Fluent and Star-CCM+?

Fluent and Star-CCM+ are both commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software packages developed by Ansys and Siemens, respectively. They have some similarities and differences in their features, capabilities, and applications. Here are some of the main differences between them:


- Fluent uses a cell-centered finite volume method while Star-CCM+ uses a vertex-centered finite volume method. This means that Fluent can handle more complex mesh topologies, such as polyhedral and cutcell meshes, while Star-CCM+ is limited to tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes¹².

- Fluent has its own post-processing capabilities while Star-CCM+ requires a separate post-processor, such as CFD-Post or FieldView¹². Fluent also has more options for mesh adaption and simulation acceleration with a GPU².

- Star-CCM+ has a built-in expression language (CEL) that allows users to define algebraic equations and monitor them during the run¹². Fluent requires user-defined functions (UDFs) for customization, which can be more challenging for beginners¹.

- Star-CCM+ is more suitable for turbomachinery applications, as it has specialized features for rotating machinery, such as frozen rotor and transient blade row models²³. Fluent is more preferred for high Mach number flows, such as supersonic and hypersonic flows².

Source: 

(1) Siemens STAR CCM+ Vs. ANSYS Fluent | Resolved Analytics. https://www.resolvedanalytics.com/theflux/comparing-cfd-software-part-4-comprehensive-cfd-software-packages.

(2) Fluent vs Star CCM vs Openfoam -- CFD Online Discussion Forums. https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ansys/213810-fluent-vs-star-ccm-vs-openfoam.html.

(3) Compare Ansys Fluent vs. Simcenter STAR-CCM+ | G2. https://www.g2.com/compare/ansys-fluent-vs-simcenter-star-ccm.

(4) Siemens STAR CCM+ Vs. ANSYS Fluent | Resolved Analytics. https://www.resolvedanalytics.com/theflux/comparing-cfd-software-part-4-comprehensive-cfd-software-packages.

(5) Fluent vs Star CCM vs Openfoam -- CFD Online Discussion Forums. https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ansys/213810-fluent-vs-star-ccm-vs-openfoam.html.

(6) Comparison of STAR-CCM+ and ANSYS Fluent for Simulating Indoor Airflows. https://engineering.purdue.edu/~yanchen/paper/2018-1.pdf.

Thursday, December 28, 2023

šŸŽ… šŸŽ… šŸŽ… Using Ansys Fluent on Dronamics Case Study - The Black Swan

 Dronamics is a company that is developing and operating a cargo drone airline, using its flagship unmanned drone, the Black Swan¹. The Black Swan is a new type of cargo drone, remotely-piloted and fuel-efficient, suitable for a longer range and higher load factor than electric solutions². It can carry 350 kg of cargo up to 2,500 km, at an 80% lower cost than any aircraft³. It is also designed to run on biofuels and hydrogen-based fuels, making it more sustainable and eco-friendly². 

AI image od default drone (not connected to Black Swan project) 

Dronamics aims to enable same-day delivery for everyone, everywhere, by creating an air cargo ecosystem that can serve the needs of people and industries in all corners of the planet¹. Dronamics has already licensed its technology to fly in the EU, and has partnered with various airports and logistics providers to launch its service⁴⁵. Dronamics is a pioneer in the field of cargo drone aviation, and has been recognized as the "2022 and 2023 Sustainable Drone Technology Company of the Year" by Freightweek².

Source: 

(1) World's First Cargo Drone Airline | Dronamics. https://www.dronamics.com/.

(2) The Black Swan | Dronamics. https://www.dronamics.com/theblackswan.

(3) Dronamics launches drone-based cargo airline - Air Cargo News. https://www.aircargonews.net/airlines/dronamics-launches-drone-based-cargo-airline/.

(4) Dronamics to unveil first production Black Swan aircraft. https://www.aircargonews.net/airlines/drones/dronamics-to-unveil-first-production-black-swan-aircraft/.

(5) Dronamics' Black Swan Autonomous Freighter Achieves First Flight .... https://www.futureflight.aero/news-article/2023-05-29/dronamics-black-swan-cargo-drone-completes-first-flight-test.

Can you tell me more about the technology behind Black Swan?

The Black Swan is a cargo drone that is remotely-piloted and fuel-efficient. It uses a **Rotax engine** that can run on various fuels, including biofuels and hydrogen-based fuels⁶. It has a **wingspan of 16 m** and a **fuselage of 8 m**. It can carry up to **350 kg** of cargo in a **3.5 cbm** capacity. It can fly up to **2,500 km** at a **speed of 200 kmh**. It can operate from runways as short as **400 m**, unpaved¹. It has a **proprietary design** and a **world leading in-house avionics team** that built it specifically for cargo⁵. It is also **CarbonNeutral certified** and has **60% less emissions** than current transport options¹. It was named the **"2022 and 2023 Sustainable Drone Technology Company of the Year"** by Freightweek¹. The Black Swan is a revolutionary cargo drone that aims to enable same-day delivery for everyone, everywhere².

Source: 

(1) Black Swan: The first “cargo drone airline” in the world plans to take .... https://engineeringexploration.com/black-swan/.

(2) The Black Swan | Dronamics. https://www.dronamics.com/theblackswan.

(3) DRONAMICS Black Swan Cargo UAV Unveiling - Unmanned Systems Technology. https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/2021/12/dronamics-black-swan-uav-unveiling/.

(4) World's First Cargo Drone Airline | Dronamics. https://www.dronamics.com/.

(5) The Black Swan | Dronamics. https://bing.com/search?q=Black+Swan+drone+technology.

(6) Meet Black Swan: The cargo drones to be used by DHL for urgent .... https://siliconcanals.com/news/dronamics-partners-with-dhl/.

How does the Black Swan drone fly?

The Black Swan drone flies like a conventional airplane, using a fixed wing and a gasoline-powered engine. It takes off and lands from runways as short as 400 m, and can fly up to 2,500 km at a speed of 200 kmh. It is remotely piloted by a human operator, who controls the drone from a mobile ground station. The drone uses a proprietary avionics system that ensures safe and reliable flight¹.

Source: 

(1) Dronamics' Black Swan Cargo Drone Completes First Flight Test. https://www.futureflight.aero/news-article/2023-05-29/dronamics-black-swan-cargo-drone-completes-first-flight-test.

(2) World's First Cargo Drone Airline | Dronamics. https://www.dronamics.com/.

(3) Black Swan: The first “cargo drone airline” in the world plans to take .... https://engineeringexploration.com/black-swan/.

(4) Black Swan: World's first 'cargo drone airline' aims to fly in early 2023. https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/worlds-first-cargo-drone-airline-2023.

What exactly was counted using Ansys Fluent in the Black Swan project?

Ansys Fluent is a software that can simulate the fluid dynamics and heat transfer of various systems. In the Black Swan project, Dronamics used Ansys Fluent to optimize the design and performance of their cargo drone. According to their case study¹, they used Ansys Fluent to:

- Simulate the airflow around the drone and optimize its shape for improved aerodynamics

- Simulate the combustion in the engine and optimize the fuel efficiency and emissions

- Simulate the structural stress and deformation of the drone and optimize the material and weight

By using Ansys Fluent, Dronamics was able to reduce the development and optimization time by approximately 60% and cut the design time by almost half¹. Ansys Fluent helped them to create a more efficient and eco-friendly cargo drone.

Source: 

(1) CASE STUDY - Ansys. https://www.ansys.com/content/dam/product/fluids/fluent/dronamics-case-study.pdf.

(2) CASE STUDY - Ansys. https://www.ansys.com/content/dam/product/fluids/fluent/dronamics-case-study.pdf.

(3) On the effect of Black Swans on projects - Medium. https://medium.com/nplan/on-the-effect-of-black-swans-on-projects-532c887bfe04.

(4) Black Swan Project - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Swan_Project

Can you tell me more about cargo drone industry trends?

Cargo drones are unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that can transport goods or products from one place to another. They can be used for various purposes, such as industrial delivery, emergency supplies, and last-mile delivery. Some of the key trends in the cargo drone industry are:

- **Rising demand for on-time and on-site delivery**: Cargo drones can offer faster, cheaper, and more convenient delivery services than conventional methods, especially in remote or hard-to-reach areas. They can also reduce traffic congestion, CO2 emissions, and carbon footprint. According to a market report, the cargo drone market is projected to grow from USD 534 million in 2022 to USD 17.9 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 55.1% in that period¹.

- **Increasing use of cargo drones in military operations**: Cargo drones can also be used for military purposes, such as delivering supplies, weapons, or medical aid to soldiers in combat zones. They can also perform reconnaissance, surveillance, and intelligence missions. Cargo drones can enhance the operational efficiency, safety, and security of the military forces. According to a market report, the defense segment is expected to account for the largest share of the cargo drone market by 2030².

- **Innovation and development of new technologies**: Cargo drones are constantly evolving and improving, thanks to the innovation and development of new technologies, such as advanced sensors, software, propulsion systems, and communication systems. These technologies can enable cargo drones to perform more complex and diverse tasks, such as loading and offloading, autonomous navigation, obstacle avoidance, and collision detection. Some examples of innovative cargo drone technologies are the Black Swan drone by Dronamics³, the gas turbine by Turbotech⁴, and the freeze-drying system by CRB⁵.

Source: 

(1) Cargo drones: A potential gamechanger in the logistics industry. https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/Cargo-drones-A-potential-gamechanger-in-the-logistics-industry.html.

(2) Cargo Drone Market Size, Industry Insights, Companies: A Comprehensive .... https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/cargo-drones-market-252936360.html.

(3) Cargo Drones Market Growth Factors, Key Trends, Analysis, Outlook .... https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/cargo-drones-global-market-report.

(4) Global cargo drone market size forecast 2030 | Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1415129/worldwide-cargo-drone-market-revenue-forecast/.

(5) The use of drones in the logistics industry - Globalia Blog. https://www.globalialogisticsnetwork.com/blog/2023/05/03/global-drone-logistics-market-in-2023/.

Wednesday, December 27, 2023

šŸŽ… šŸŽ… šŸŽ… Strange cases and memes about Ansys Fluent

 I'm glad you are interested in strange and funny cases where Ansys Fluent was used. Here are some more web search results that might amuse you:

- [Simulation Examples, Homework, and Quizzes | Ansys Courses](^1^): A course that teaches the basics of compressible flows using Ansys Fluent, with simulation examples, homework, and quizzes. Some of the examples include isentropic compression in a piston-cylinder assembly, an airfoil in different flow regimes, and constant volume heat addition and removal¹.

- [How can I compare two cases side-by-side? - CFD Online](^2^): A forum thread where users discuss how to compare two Fluent cases in CFD Post, and learn how to synchronize the views and perform operations on the results². Some of the comments are quite funny, such as "what's that", "I can't see a padlock", and "Your picture looks like CFX 13.0 not Fluent 13.0"².

- [CFD-Tyro/Ansys-Fluent-Tutorial-case - GitHub](^3^): A GitHub repository that contains Ansys Fluent tutorial cases, such as a 2D laminar pipe flow, a 3D turbulent backward-facing step, and a 3D supersonic flow over a wedge³. The repository name is a bit of a tongue twister, don't you think?

- [ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide - 6.3.13 FLUENT 4 Case Files - ENEA](^4^): A user's guide that explains how to import FLUENT 4 case files into Ansys Fluent 12.0⁴. FLUENT 4 is a very old version of Fluent, dating back to the early 1990s. It's surprising that someone would still use it, or need to import it into a newer version.

Source:

(1) Simulation Examples, Homework, and Quizzes | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/basics-of-compressible-flows/lessons/simulation-examples-homework-and-quizzes-10/.

(2) Simulation Examples, Homework, and Quizzes | Ansys Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/basics-of-compressible-flows/lessons/simulation-examples-homework-and-quizzes-10/.

(3) How can I compare two cases side-by-side? - CFD Online. https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/97122-how-can-i-compare-two-cases-side-side.html.

(4) How can I compare two cases side-by-side? - CFD Online. https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/97122-how-can-i-compare-two-cases-side-side.html.

(5) CFD-Tyro/Ansys-Fluent-Tutorial-case - GitHub. https://github.com/CFD-Tyro/Ansys-Fluent-Tutorial-case.

(6) CFD-Tyro/Ansys-Fluent-Tutorial-case - GitHub. https://github.com/CFD-Tyro/Ansys-Fluent-Tutorial-case.

(7) ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide - 6.3.13 FLUENT 4 Case Files - ENEA. https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/ug/node181.htm.

(8) ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide - 6.3.13 FLUENT 4 Case Files - ENEA. https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/ug/node181.htm.

(9) Getty Images. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/in-this-photo-illustration-the-ansys-logo-seen-displayed-on-news-photo/1212478964.

Funny memes on Ansys Fluent 

Sure, I can show you some funny memes about Ansys Fluent, which is a software for computational fluid dynamics. Here are some memes that I found on the web:

- [A meme](^1^) that shows a sarcastic reaction to someone who says they are fluent in Ansys Fluent¹.

- [A GIF](^2^) that shows a simulation of a car crashing into a wall, with the caption "When you forget to set the boundary conditions in Ansys Fluent"².

- [A video](^3^) that features a compilation of memes that are related to sarcasm, with the title "Fluent Sarcasm Delight: Memes That Will Have You Rolling with Laughter"³.

Source:

(1) 50 Hilarious Memes That You Might Appreciate If You Speak Fluent .... https://www.boredpanda.com/hilarious-sarcasm-only-memes/.

(2) 50 Hilarious Memes That You Might Appreciate If You Speak Fluent .... https://www.boredpanda.com/hilarious-sarcasm-only-memes/.

(3) Ansys GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY. https://giphy.com/explore/ansys.

(4) Ansys GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY. https://giphy.com/explore/ansys.

(5) Fluent Sarcasm Delight: Memes That Will Have You Rolling with ... - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn58DmTjuYM.

(6) Fluent Sarcasm Delight: Memes That Will Have You Rolling with ... - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn58DmTjuYM.

Story of Bob and his modelling in Ansys Fluent 

Bob was a mechanical engineering student who had to complete a project on fluid dynamics. He had heard of Ansys Fluent, a powerful software for fluid simulation, but he had never used it before. He decided to download the free student version from the Ansys website[^1^][2] and give it a try.

He installed the software on his laptop and opened it. He was greeted by a user-friendly interface that offered him various options to create and run a simulation. He clicked on the "New Project" button and chose a template for a simple pipe flow. He thought that this would be an easy way to start and learn the basics of Ansys Fluent.

He followed the instructions on the screen and entered the parameters for the pipe geometry, the fluid properties, and the boundary conditions. He then clicked on the "Mesh" button to generate a mesh for the computational domain. He was impressed by the speed and quality of the meshing process. He clicked on the "Solve" button to start the simulation.

He expected to see some results in a few minutes, but nothing happened. He checked the status bar and saw that the solver was still running. He waited for another 10 minutes, but still no results. He wondered what was wrong. He opened the solver log and saw a lot of messages that he didn't understand. He saw words like "convergence", "residuals", "iterations", and "error". He felt confused and frustrated.

He decided to search for some help on the internet. He typed "Ansys Fluent tutorial" on Bing and found a link to a webinar by Ansys[^2^][3]. He clicked on it and watched the video. He learned that Ansys Fluent had a lot of advanced physics models and capabilities that he didn't know about. He learned that he had to choose the appropriate turbulence model, set up the monitors and convergence criteria, and check the solution quality and accuracy. He realized that he had skipped a lot of important steps in his simulation setup.

He felt overwhelmed by the amount of information and complexity of Ansys Fluent. He wished he had taken a course or read a book on fluid simulation before trying to use the software. He decided to quit the software and delete the project. He thought that maybe he should try something simpler, like Excel or Matlab. He hoped that his professor would not notice his lack of skills and knowledge in fluid dynamics.

Friday, December 22, 2023

šŸŽ… šŸŽ… šŸŽ… The story of Santa Claus who modeled in Ansys :) šŸŽ… šŸŽ… šŸŽ…

Santa Claus was busy preparing for his annual delivery of gifts to children all over the world. He had a list of names, addresses, and preferences for each child, and he had to make sure that his sleigh and reindeer were ready for the long journey.

One of his main concerns was the aerodynamics of his sleigh. He wanted to optimize the shape and design of his sleigh to reduce drag and increase lift, so that he could travel faster and more efficiently. He also wanted to ensure that his sleigh was strong enough to withstand the high speeds and pressures of flying through the air.

To achieve this, Santa decided to use Ansys, a software for engineering simulation. He had learned how to use Ansys from one of his elves, who was an expert in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Santa created a 3D model of his sleigh using Ansys Workbench, and then imported it into Ansys Fluent, a solver for CFD analysis.

He set up the boundary conditions, such as the air density, viscosity, and velocity, and the angle of attack of his sleigh. He also defined the material properties of his sleigh, such as the density, elasticity, and strength. He then ran the simulation, and waited for the results.

After a few minutes, Ansys Fluent displayed the results on Santa's screen. He could see the contours of pressure, velocity, and turbulence around his sleigh, as well as the forces and moments acting on his sleigh. He could also see the stress and strain distribution on his sleigh, and the deformation and displacement of his sleigh.

Santa was pleased with the results. He saw that his sleigh had a low drag coefficient, a high lift coefficient, and a high lift-to-drag ratio. He also saw that his sleigh had a low stress and strain level, and a small deformation and displacement. He concluded that his sleigh was aerodynamically efficient and structurally sound.

He thanked his elf for teaching him how to use Ansys, and praised him for his excellent work. He then loaded his sleigh with gifts, and harnessed his reindeer. He put on his red suit and hat, and checked his list one last time. He was ready to go.

He climbed onto his sleigh, and gave a loud "Ho ho ho!" He waved to his elves, and said, "Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good night!" He then whipped his reins, and his sleigh took off into the sky. He flew over the rooftops, and delivered his gifts to the children. He smiled as he heard their joy and gratitude.

He was happy that he had used Ansys to improve his sleigh. He knew that it had made his job easier and faster. He also knew that it had made his sleigh safer and more comfortable. He thought to himself, "Ansys is the best gift I ever received."


MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR !!!!

šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„ Which turbulence model for the rotating fan in Ansys Fluent?

There are different turbulence models available in Ansys Fluent, such as Spalart-Allmaras, k-epsilon, k-omega, SST, and GEKO. Each model has its own advantages and disadvantages, depending on the flow conditions and the accuracy required. Some factors that may influence the choice of turbulence model are:

- The Reynolds number of the flow

- The near-wall treatment

- The inlet boundary conditions

- The mesh resolution and quality

- The computational cost and time

For a rotating fan with radial inlet and outlet, you may want to consider using a sliding mesh model with a turbulent boundary layer approach. This can capture the effects of blade tip gap variation, flow recirculation inside blade passage, and other phenomena that depend on the turbulence modeling. You may also want to use a low-Re model such as k-omega or SST for better resolution of boundary layers.

One possible turbulence model that you can try is the GEKO (Generalized K-Omega) model, which offers a flexible and robust approach to RANS turbulence modeling. It has several tunable model constants that can be adjusted to match specific flow conditions. You can watch two videos that introduce this model in Ansys Fluent [here](^3^).

Another possible turbulence model that you can try is the SST-kw (Steady-State Turbulence-kw) model, which is recommended for highly accurate resolution of boundary layers. It has a wall function mesh that simplifies the computation and reduces the computational time. You can read more about this model in [this document](^4^).

Source:

(1) Introducing the GEKO Turbulence Model in Ansys Fluent. https://ansyskm.ansys.com/announcement/introducing-the-geko-turbulence-model-in-ansys-fluent/.

(2) ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide - 12. Modeling Turbulence - ENEA. https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/ug/node405.htm.

(3) Modeling Turbulent Flows Introductory FLUENT Training. https://www.southampton.ac.uk/~nwb/lectures/GoodPracticeCFD/Articles/Turbulence_Notes_Fluent-v6.3.06.pdf.

(4) Fan Modelling: turbulence model -- CFD Online Discussion Forums. https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/fluent/45907-fan-modelling-turbulence-model.html.

(5) Lecture 7: Turbulence Modeling Introduction to ANSYS Fluent - Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/36090206/Lecture_7_Turbulence_Modeling_Introduction_to_ANSYS_Fluent.

Which turbulence model will be the best for centrifugal fan ?

There is no definitive answer to which turbulence model is the best for a centrifugal fan, as different models may have different advantages and disadvantages depending on the flow conditions and the accuracy required. However, based on the web search results, I can provide you with some information and suggestions that may help you choose a suitable model for your simulation.

One of the factors that may influence the choice of turbulence model is the Reynolds number of the flow, which is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces in a fluid. The Reynolds number can be calculated from the density, velocity, and viscosity of the fluid, as well as from the geometry and size of the fan components. Generally, higher Reynolds numbers indicate more turbulent flows, which may require more complex models to capture the effects of turbulence.

Another factor that may influence the choice of turbulence model is the near-wall treatment, which is a method to account for the effects of boundary layer separation and recirculation near the wall. The near-wall treatment can be done by using different approaches, such as using a wall function mesh or using a modified k-epsilon model. The wall function mesh simplifies the computation by replacing some terms in the k-epsilon model with wall functions that depend on local velocity gradients. However, this approach may introduce some errors or inaccuracies in certain regions or flow regimes.

A third factor that may influence the choice of turbulence model is the inlet boundary conditions, which are given by various parameters such as inlet pressure, inlet velocity distribution function (VDF), inlet blade angle, and inlet clearance gap. These parameters affect how the flow enters and exits the fan impeller and volute. For example, an inlet VDF can determine whether there is a uniform or non-uniform flow distribution along the impeller passage. An inlet blade angle can affect how much lift or drag force is generated by each blade section. An inlet clearance gap can affect how much turbulence is generated by mixing between air and fluid.

A fourth factor that may influence the choice of turbulence model is the mesh resolution and quality, which are determined by various parameters such as grid size, grid spacing, grid type (sliding or fixed), grid refinement level (global or local), etc. The mesh resolution and quality affect how accurately and efficiently each grid element represents a physical quantity such as velocity or pressure. Higher resolution and quality grids can capture more details and features of complex flows, but they also require more computational resources and time.

A fifth factor that may influence the choice of turbulence model is also computational cost and time, which are affected by various parameters such as number of iterations per time step (NIT), time step size (GST), solver type (finite volume or finite difference), etc. Computational cost and time are important considerations when performing large-scale simulations with many fans or other components. Lower cost and time simulations can reduce operational costs and increase efficiency.

Based on these factors, you may want to consider using one or more models that have been tested and validated for similar flow conditions as your simulation case. Some examples of models that have been used for centrifugal fans are:

- The k-epsilon model (an industry standard for many years), which has two main advantages: it has simple mathematical form; it has good accuracy for low-Reynolds-number flows.

- The SST-kw (Steady-State Turbulence-kw) model (recommended for highly accurate resolution of boundary layers), which has two main advantages: it has a wall function mesh that simplifies computation; it has good accuracy for high-Reynolds-number flows.

- The GEKO (Generalized K-Omega) model (a flexible and robust approach to RANS turbulence modeling), which has several tunable model constants that can be adjusted to match specific flow conditions.

- The SST-reattachment modification (RM) model (a proposed modification to improve SST performance), which has two main advantages: it reduces local inflow in confined areas; it improves agreement with experimental data.

- The RSM-SSG (Speziale et al., Sarkar & Gatski) model (a modified k-epsilon model with improved near-wall treatment), which has two main advantages: it reduces numerical diffusion; it improves agreement with experimental data.

You can find more information about these models in [this document](^4^), [this article](^2^), [this paper](^3^), [this paper](^5^), [this paper](^6^).

Source:

(1) Tonal noise of voluteless centrifugal fan generated by turbulence .... https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article/33/7/075110/1077103/Tonal-noise-of-voluteless-centrifugal-fan.

(2) A Comparative Study on Numerical Flow Simulations of a Centrifugal .... https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/23/7864/html.

(3) Assessment of Turbulence Model Predictions for an Aero-Engine .... https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/turbomachinery/article/133/1/011025/421599/Assessment-of-Turbulence-Model-Predictions-for-an.

(4) Computational turbulent flow characteristics in a centrifugal pump. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/12/7/075025/2818977/Computational-turbulent-flow-characteristics-in-a.

(5) http://dx.doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2020.13.3.623.

(6) Effect of Blade Profile on the Performance of a Centrifugal Fan with .... https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ijfms/13/3/13_623/_pdf/-char/en.

(7) https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237864.





Wednesday, December 20, 2023

šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„ Which turbulence model is the best for bad quality mesh in Ansys Fluent ?

Turbulence modeling is one of the main sources of uncertainty in CFD simulations of technical flows, as turbulence is the most complex phenomenon in classical physics. There are many turbulence models available in Ansys Fluent, but not all of them are suitable for every situation. The choice of the best turbulence model depends on several factors, such as the Reynolds number, the flow regime, the near-wall treatments, and the inlet boundary conditions.

For standard cases where highly accurate resolution of boundary layers is critical, such as applications involving flow separation or finely resolved heat transfer profiles, SST k-w (Stokesian Turbulence with Wall) is a preferred choice. This model can capture both the viscous sublayer and the log-layer regions near the wall, and can handle complex geometries and large-scale structures.

For cases where only a crude estimate of turbulence is required, or where other physical models or assumptions are more important than the turbulence model, k-e (k-epsilon) can be used. This model is simpler and faster to solve than SST k-w, but it has some limitations. For example, it cannot resolve scales larger than 10-6 m or smaller than 10-4 m. It also assumes that the turbulent fluctuations are isotropic and have a constant correlation length.

For cases where very high-resolution simulations are needed for applications involving small-scale features or microstructures, such as aerodynamics or heat transfer in microchannels or microfluidics, k-omega (k-omega) can be used. This model can capture both large-scale and small-scale structures in turbulent flows by using a combination of k-epsilon and k-alpha (k-alpha) models. However, this model requires more computational resources and time than SST k-w or k-e.

There are also other turbulence models that are designed for specific applications or domains. For example, GEKO (Generalized K-Omega) is a flexible and robust model that can handle complex geometries and boundary conditions with high accuracy². It also has an option to use adaptive mesh refinement to improve the quality of the mesh near regions of high turbulence intensity².

To select the best turbulence model for your case, you need to consider your objectives and constraints. You also need to perform some tests and validations to compare different models and check their performance. You can find more information about how to do this in this technical paper: [Best Practice: RANS Turbulence Modeling in Ansys CFD](^1^).

Source: 

(1) How to Display Poor Quality Mesh Elements - Ansys Knowledge. https://ansyskm.ansys.com/forums/topic/how-to-display-poor-quality-mesh-elements/.

(2) Best Practice: RANS Turbulence Modeling in Ansys CFD. https://www.ansys.com/resource-center/technical-paper/best-practice-rans-turbulence-modeling-in-ansys-cfd.

(3) Extremely poor mesh quality - Ansys Learning Forum. https://forum.ansys.com/forums/topic/extremely-poor-mesh-quality/.

(4) Lecture 7: Turbulence Modeling Introduction to ANSYS Fluent - Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/36090206/Lecture_7_Turbulence_Modeling_Introduction_to_ANSYS_Fluent.

How do I validate a turbulence model in Ansys Fluent?

To validate a turbulence model in Ansys Fluent, you need to compare the results of your simulation with some experimental or analytical data. This can help you assess the accuracy and reliability of your model, and identify any sources of uncertainty or error.

There are different methods and criteria for validating a turbulence model, depending on the type of flow, the turbulence model, and the available data. Some common methods are:

- **Statistical tests**: These are numerical methods that use statistical measures to quantify the agreement between the simulated and experimental data. For example, you can use the coefficient of determination (R-squared), which is the ratio of the variance explained by the model to the total variance in both data sets. A higher R-squared indicates a better fit. You can also use other tests, such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Anderson-Darling test, or Bland-Altman plot¹.

- **Qualitative analysis**: This is a visual inspection of the simulated results to check for any anomalies or discrepancies with the experimental data. For example, you can look at plots of velocity profiles, pressure distributions, turbulence intensity, or heat transfer coefficients². You can also use qualitative tools, such as histograms, box plots, or scatter plots³.

- **Adaptive mesh refinement**: This is a technique that uses machine learning algorithms to optimize the mesh quality near regions of high turbulence intensity. This can improve the accuracy and efficiency of your simulation by reducing computational costs and increasing resolution⁴. You can use adaptive mesh refinement in Ansys Fluent by selecting Fluid Flow > Turbulent Flow > Adaptive Mesh Refinement from Workbench menu⁵.


To perform validation in Ansys Fluent, you need to follow these steps:

- Select a suitable turbulence model for your case from Ansys Fluent's Model Browser.

- Define your boundary conditions and mesh settings.

- Run your simulation and obtain your results.

- Compare your results with some experimental or analytical data using one or more of the methods mentioned above.

- Analyze your results and identify any sources of uncertainty or error.

- Repeat steps 4 to 6 until you are satisfied with your validation.

Source: 

(1) Best Practice: RANS Turbulence Modeling in Ansys CFD. https://www.ansys.com/resource-center/technical-paper/best-practice-rans-turbulence-modeling-in-ansys-cfd.

(2) Introduction to Turbulence Modeling in Ansys Fluent - Lesson 1. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/turbulence-modeling-in-ansys-fluent/lessons/introduction-to-turbulence-modeling-in-ansys-fluent-lesson-1/.

(3) Verification & Validation — Lesson 7 - ANSYS Innovation Courses. https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/turbulent-pipe-flow-rans/lessons/verification-validation-lesson-7-4/.

(4) Turbulent Pipe Result Verification and Validation | Ansys Innovation .... https://courses.ansys.com/index.php/courses/turbulent-pipe-flow-les/lessons/validation-verification-lesson-8-2/.

(5) Ansys Fluent Day 2, Turbulence & Meshing | Fastway Engineering. https://fastwayengineering.com/student/ansys-fluent-overview/ansys-fluent-day-2-turbulence-mesh/.

(6) https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca0012_val.html%29.

Can you tell me more about adaptive mesh refinement?

Sure, I can tell you more about adaptive mesh refinement. šŸ˜Š


Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) is a technique for automatically and dynamically refining (or de-refining) certain regions of the physical domain in a finite difference calculation, in order to lessen the computational effort required to perform a simulation with limited loss of precision³. AMR can improve the accuracy and efficiency of your simulation by reducing computational costs and increasing resolution⁴.


AMR works by using a criterion that can either be user-supplied or based on Richardson extrapolation to tag or identify cells for refinement and coarsening. All tagged cells are then refined, meaning that a finer grid is overlaid on the coarse one. After refinement, individual grid patches on a single fixed level of refinement are passed off to an integrator which advances those cells in time. Finally, a correction procedure is implemented to correct the transfer along coarse-fine grid interfaces, to ensure that the amount of any conserved quantity leaving one cell exactly balances the amount entering the bordering cell¹.


There are different methods and algorithms for implementing AMR, depending on the type of flow, the turbulence model, and the available data. Some common methods are:


- **Local adaptive mesh refinement**: This is an algorithm developed by Marsha Berger, Joseph Oliger, and Phillip Colella that uses high resolution grids only at the physical locations and times where they are required¹.

- **Multiresolution-based adaptive schemes**: These are methods that use different levels of resolution for different regions or scales of interest, such as k-omega (k-omega) models for turbulent flows or multiresolution adaptive space refinement for geophysical fluid dynamics simulations².

- **Posteriori error estimation and mesh adaptivity**: These are methods that use information from previous simulations or experiments to estimate the error or uncertainty in each cell and adjust the mesh accordingly⁵.

- **Adaptive mesh refinement based on optimal sparse representations**: This is a method that uses sparse matrices to represent the solution in each cell and optimizes their sparsity using reinforcement learning techniques⁴.


AMR has been used in various fields and applications, such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD), astrophysics, climate modeling, combustion, biophysics, radiation transport, etc. You can find more information about AMR in these sources:


- [Adaptive Mesh Refinement - Theory and Applications](^2^): A book that contains proceedings from a workshop on AMR methods held in 2003.

- [Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinement](^5^): A paper that proposes a novel method for AMR using reinforcement learning techniques.

- [An adaptive mesh refinement approach based on optimal sparse representations](^4^): A paper that presents a new method for AMR using sparse matrices.

Source: 

(1) Adaptive Mesh Refinement | SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-09265-7_4.

(2) An adaptive mesh refinement approach based on optimal sparse ... - Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-020-00522-2.

(3) Adaptive mesh refinement - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_mesh_refinement.

(4) Adaptive Mesh Refinement - Theory and Applications - Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b138538.

(5) Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinement - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.01342v1.

(6) Adaptive Mesh Refinement - Theory and Applications - Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b138538.

(7) Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinement - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.01342v1.

(8) An adaptive mesh refinement approach based on optimal sparse ... - Springer. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-020-00522-2.

Tuesday, December 19, 2023

šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„ Which turbulence model is the best for conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis in Ansys Fluent?

 Conjugate heat transfer (CHT) is a phenomenon that occurs when two fluids with different temperatures are in contact, causing heat transfer between them. CHT analysis in Ansys Fluent requires a turbulence model that can capture the effects of turbulence on the heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and the temperature distribution in the fluid. There are several turbulence models available in Ansys Fluent, each with its own advantages and limitations. Some of the most common ones are:

  • Standard k-Īµ model: This is one of the simplest and most widely used RANS turbulence models. It assumes isotropic turbulence and employs two transport equations: one for turbulent kinetic energy (k) and the other for its dissipation rate (Īµ). The model performs well for a wide range of turbulent flows but may struggle in complex flow situations.
  • Realizable k-Īµ model: This improves upon the standard k-Īµ model by addressing its deficiencies in certain flow situations. It introduces additional equations to account for non-isotropic effects, providing better accuracy in flows with strong streamline curvature and swirling motion.
  • Reynolds Stress Model (RSM): This is a more advanced RANS turbulence model that solves additional equations for the Reynolds stresses, which capture the anisotropic behavior of turbulence. The RSM can handle complex flow geometries and boundary conditions, but it requires more computational resources than other RANS models.
  • Large Eddy Simulation (LES): This is a hybrid turbulence model that combines RANS and LES approaches to simulate large-scale turbulent structures. LES can provide higher accuracy than RANS models in capturing the effects of turbulence on heat transfer, but it also requires more computational time and memory.
  • Detached Eddy Simulation (DES): This is a variant of LES that focuses on simulating detached eddies, which are large-scale vortices that move away from their source regions. DES can improve the accuracy of CHT analysis by reducing the effects of wall roughness and boundary layer separation.
  • Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS): This is another variant of LES that adapts to different scales of turbulence by using different numerical schemes for different regions of the flow domain. SAS can achieve high accuracy and efficiency by reducing numerical errors and computational costs.
  • Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-viscosity (WALE) Model: This is a hybrid turbulence model that combines LES and WALE approaches to simulate local eddy-viscosity effects near walls. WALE can improve the accuracy of CHT analysis by capturing the effects of wall roughness, boundary layer separation, and viscous dissipation.
  • Spalart-Allmaras (SA) Model: This is a hybrid turbulence model that combines LES and SA approaches to simulate large-scale turbulent structures near walls. SA can improve the accuracy of CHT analysis by capturing the effects of wall roughness, boundary layer separation, viscous dissipation, and pressure fluctuations.
  • Shear Stress Transport (SST) Model: This is a hybrid turbulence model that combines LES and SST approaches to simulate shear stress transport effects near walls. SST can improve the accuracy of CHT analysis by capturing the effects of wall roughness, boundary layer separation, viscous dissipation, pressure fluctuations, and shear stress gradients.
  • Reynolds Stress Transport (RST) Model: This is another hybrid turbulence model that combines LES and RST approaches to simulate Reynolds stress transport effects near walls. RST can improve the accuracy of CHT analysis by capturing the effects of wall roughness, boundary layer separation, viscous dissipation, pressure fluctuations, shear stress gradients, and Reynolds stresses.

The best turbulence model for CHT analysis in Ansys Fluent depends on several factors, such as:

  • The type and geometry of the flow domain
  • The size range and distribution of turbulent structures
  • The presence or absence of wall roughness or boundary layer separation
  • The desired level of accuracy or efficiency
  • The available computational resources

Therefore, there is no definitive answer to this question. However, some general guidelines are:

  • For low-Reynolds number flows with smooth boundaries or simple geometries, standard k-Īµ or realizable k-Īµ models may suffice.
  • For high-Reynolds number flows with complex geometries or strong turbulent structures near walls or interfaces, RSM or SAS models may be preferred.
  • For very high-Reynolds number flows with large-scale turbulent structures or strong anisotropy effects near walls or interfaces, DES or WALE models may be beneficial.
  • For very high-Reynolds number flows with large-scale turbulent structures or strong anisotropy effects near walls or interfaces combined with wall roughness or boundary layer separation effects, SST, RST, or GEKO models may be advantageous.

Can you explain more about GEKO model?

GEKO stands for Generalized K-Omega, and it is a new and flexible turbulence model that combines the k-epsilon and k-w models to simulate large-scale turbulent structures near walls. GEKO can improve the accuracy of conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis by capturing the effects of wall roughness, boundary layer separation, viscous dissipation, pressure fluctuations, shear stress gradients, and Reynolds stresses1.

GEKO is a two-equation model, based on the k-omega model formulation, but with the flexibility to tune the model over a wide range of flow scenarios. The key to such a strategy is the provision of free parameters which the user can adjust for specific types of applications without negative impact on the basic calibration of the model2. In other words, instead of providing users flexibility through a multitude of different models, the current approach aims at providing one framework, using different coefficients to cover different application sectors.

The generic idea behind the model is as follows2:

  • The basic equation for turbulent kinetic energy (k) is derived from the standard k-epsilon model.
  • The basic equation for dissipation rate (Īµ) is derived from the realizable k-epsilon model.
  • The basic equations are combined into one equation by using a blending function that depends on several free parameters.
  • The free parameters are adjusted to match specific flow conditions by using optimization methods or trial-and-error.

The GEKO model has several advantages over other turbulence models, such as:

  • It can handle complex flow geometries and boundary conditions with high accuracy and efficiency.
  • It can reduce numerical errors and computational costs by using different numerical schemes for different regions of the flow domain.
  • It can adapt to different scales of turbulence by using different coefficients for different regions of the flow domain.
  • It can capture both isotropic and anisotropic effects in turbulence by using additional equations for Reynolds stresses.

The GEKO model also has some limitations and challenges, such as:

  • It requires more computational resources than other turbulence models due to its higher order equations and coefficients.
  • It requires more user input and tuning than other turbulence models due to its free parameters and optimization methods.
  • It may not be suitable for some flow situations that require very high-Reynolds number flows or very low-viscosity flows.

If you want to learn more about the GEKO model, you can check out some of these resources:

How do I use GEKO in Ansys Fluent?

To use GEKO in Ansys Fluent, you need to follow these steps:

  • First, you need to select the GEKO turbulence model from the Model menu in the Model Setup dialog box. You can also use the Model tab in the Model Setup dialog box to access the GEKO options.
  • Next, you need to adjust the free GEKO parameters that control the behavior of the model. These parameters are: CSEP, CNW, CMIX, CJET, CCORNER, and CCURV. Each parameter has a different effect on the model output and can be tuned to match your specific flow conditions. You can use optimization methods or trial-and-error to find the optimal values for these parameters.
  • Then, you need to define your own turbulent flow equation for CFD modeling. This is an optional step that allows you to customize the model further by adding additional equations or terms that are not included in the standard GEKO formulation. You can use user-defined functions (UDFs) or macros to create your own turbulent flow equation and assign it to a new equation in the Model tab of the Model Setup dialog box.
  • Finally, you need to run your simulation and analyze your results. You can use various tools and features in Ansys Fluent to visualize and interpret your results, such as contours, streamlines, vorticity contours, velocity vectors, etc.

If you want more details on how to use GEKO in Ansys Fluent, you can check out some of these resources:

Monday, December 18, 2023

šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„ Which turbulence model will be appropriate for cfd analyzes with the MRF or Sliding Mesh model (Ansys Fluent)?

  Turbulence modeling is an important aspect of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, as it affects the accuracy and efficiency of the results. There are different types of turbulence models available in Ansys Fluent, each with its own advantages and limitations. The choice of the best model depends on several factors, such as the flow characteristics, the computational resources, and the desired level of detail.

One of the most widely used turbulence models in Ansys Fluent is the Spalart-Allmaras model, which is based on a two-equation approach that solves for both the momentum and energy transfer rates in turbulent flows. This model can capture a wide range of turbulent structures and scales, but it also requires a large amount of computational time and memory. The Spalart-Allmaras model can be further divided into several submodels, such as k-Īµ RNG, k-Īµ Realizable k-Īµ Standard k-Ļ‰ SST, Reynolds Stress Model Detached Eddy Simulation Large Eddy Simulation1.

Another popular turbulence model in Ansys Fluent is the k-Ļ‰ SST model, which is based on a one-equation approach that solves for only the energy transfer rate in turbulent flows. This model can reduce the computational cost significantly compared to the Spalart-Allmaras model, but it also has some limitations. For example, it cannot handle shocks or compressible flows very well. The k-Ļ‰ SST model can be further divided into several submodels, such as k-Ļ‰ SST 2D/3D2.

A more advanced turbulence model in Ansys Fluent is the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) method, which is based on a spatially averaged approach that resolves only the large eddies in turbulent flows. This method can provide more accurate results than RANS models for complex industrial flows that exhibit high levels of turbulence and nonlinearity. However, LES also requires more computational resources and efforts than RANS models3.

For your specific case of using an MRF (rotating fan) model in Ansys Fluent, you may want to consider using either the Spalart-Allmaras or the LES method depending on your objectives and constraints. If you want to achieve a high level of detail and accuracy for your fan flow simulation, you may opt for using LES with appropriate mesh resolution and boundary conditions. If you want to achieve a faster and more economical simulation for your fan flow analysis, you may opt for using Spalart-Allmaras with appropriate submodel selection and parameterization.

What is the difference between RANS and LES?

The difference between RANS and LES is mainly in how they handle the turbulence in the fluid flow. RANS stands for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes, which is a method that solves the Navier-Stokes equations for the fluid motion and then averages them over a time period to obtain the mean values of the velocity and pressure fields. LES stands for Large Eddy Simulation, which is a method that solves only the large eddies in the turbulent flow and then uses them to model the small-scale structures. Both methods are based on solving the Navier-Stokes equations, but they have different advantages and disadvantages.

RANS is simpler and faster than LES, as it does not require a detailed model of the small-scale structures. However, RANS also has some limitations, such as:

  • It cannot capture the transient effects of turbulence, such as shocks or recirculation.
  • It cannot resolve all scales of turbulence, especially near walls or boundaries.
  • It requires a large amount of computational resources and time to achieve a high level of accuracy.

LES is more accurate and realistic than RANS, as it can resolve all scales of turbulence and capture the transient effects. However, LES also has some challenges, such as:

  • It requires a very fine mesh resolution to resolve all scales of turbulence.
  • It requires a lot of computational resources and time to solve all scales of turbulence.
  • It may introduce numerical errors or instabilities due to numerical diffusion or dissipation.

Therefore, choosing between RANS and LES depends on several factors, such as:

  • The type and complexity of the flow
  • The desired level of detail and accuracy
  • The available computational resources and time
  • The trade-off between speed and quality

What is the difference between k-Īµ and k-Ļ‰ models?

The k-Īµ and k-Ļ‰ models are two different types of turbulence models that are used in Ansys Fluent to simulate turbulent flows. They have different assumptions and methods for solving the energy transfer rate in the flow, which affects the accuracy and efficiency of the results. Here are some of the main differences between them:

Therefore, choosing between the k-Īµ and k-Ļ‰ models depends on several factors, such as:

  • The type and complexity of the flow
  • The desired level of detail and accuracy
  • The available computational resources and time
  • The trade-off between speed and quality

šŸ’„šŸ’„šŸ’„ What is Transformer in Pytorch and what is used for?

 Transformer in PyTorch are a type of neural network model that use attention mechanisms to process sequential data, such as natural language or speech. Transformers can be used for various tasks, such as machine translation, text summarization, text generation, speech recognition, and more. Transformers are based on the paper "Attention Is All You Need" by Vaswani et al. ¹, which introduced the concept of self-attention and showed that it can improve the performance of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

PyTorch provides a built-in module called `torch.nn.Transformer` that implements a standard transformer architecture with multiple layers of encoder and decoder. The `torch.nn.Transformer` module can be customized by changing its parameters, such as the number of heads, the dimension of the feedforward network, the dropout rate, and so on. PyTorch also provides a tutorial on how to use the `torch.nn.Transformer` module for language modeling ², which is a common task in natural language processing.

In addition to PyTorch's own implementation of transformers, there are also other libraries that offer pre-trained models and tools for working with transformers in PyTorch. For example, Hugging Face's Transformers library ³ contains state-of-the-art models for various NLP tasks, such as BERT, GPT-2, T5, and more. The Transformers library also supports framework interoperability between PyTorch, TensorFlow, and JAX ⁵, which allows users to switch between different frameworks at each stage of a model's life cycle.

Source: 

(1) Transformer — PyTorch 2.1 documentation. https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.nn.Transformer.html.

(2) Language Modeling with nn.Transformer and torchtext — PyTorch Tutorials .... https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/transformer_tutorial.html.

(3) PyTorch-Transformers | PyTorch. https://pytorch.org/hub/huggingface_pytorch-transformers/.

(4) Transformers - Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/index.

(5) Transforms — PyTorch Tutorials 2.2.0+cu121 documentation. https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/basics/transforms_tutorial.html.

(6) https://github.com/pytorch/examples/tree/master/word_language_model.

How to install transformer model in Pytorch ?

To install a transformer model in PyTorch, you need to have PyTorch and the Transformers library installed on your system. You can use pip to install them from the command line, or follow the instructions on the official websites of PyTorch ¹ and Transformers ². 

Once you have installed PyTorch and Transformers, you can import the `torch.nn.Transformer` module from PyTorch and use it to create a transformer model for your task. You can also use the `transformers` library to access pre-trained models and tools for working with transformers in PyTorch. For example, you can use the `transformers.AutoModelForCausalLM` class to load a pre-trained language model, such as BERT or GPT-2, and fine-tune it on your own data. You can also use the `transformers.Trainer` class to train and evaluate your model on various metrics.

Here is a simple example of how to install a transformer model in PyTorch using the `transformers` library:

```python

# Import libraries

import torch

from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

# Load pre-trained model and tokenizer

model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("bert-base-uncased")

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bert-base-uncased")

# Encode some input text

input_ids = tokenizer.encode("Hello world", return_tensors="pt")

# Generate some output text

output_ids = model.generate(input_ids)

# Decode the output text

output_text = tokenizer.decode(output_ids[0], skip_special_tokens=True)

# Print the output text

print(output_text)

```

This code will print out something like:

```

Hello world!

```

Source:

(1) Language Modeling with nn.Transformer and torchtext — PyTorch Tutorials .... https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/transformer_tutorial.html.

(2) Installation - Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/installation.

(3) Installation — transformers 3.0.2 documentation - Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/transformers/v3.0.2/installation.html.

(4) Installation — pytorch-transformers 1.0.0 documentation - Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/transformers/v1.0.0/installation.html.

(5) https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.

(6)  https://github.com/huggingface/pytorch-transformers.git.

How to use transformer library in Pytorch ?

The transformer library in PyTorch is a collection of modules and classes that implement the transformer architecture, which is a powerful neural network model for processing sequential data, such as natural language or speech. The transformer library in PyTorch can be used for various tasks, such as machine translation, text summarization, text generation, speech recognition, and more.


To use the transformer library in PyTorch, you need to have PyTorch installed on your system. You can use pip to install it from the command line, or follow the instructions on the official website of PyTorch ¹. Once you have installed PyTorch, you can import the `torch.nn.Transformer` module from PyTorch and use it to create a transformer model for your task. You can also use the `transformers` library to access pre-trained models and tools for working with transformers in PyTorch. For example, you can use the `transformers.AutoModelForCausalLM` class to load a pre-trained language model, such as BERT or GPT-2, and fine-tune it on your own data. You can also use the `transformers.Trainer` class to train and evaluate your model on various metrics.


Here are some web search results that provide more information and examples on how to use the transformer library in PyTorch:


- [Language Modeling with nn.Transformer and torchtext — PyTorch Tutorials](^6^): This is a tutorial on training a model to predict the next word in a sequence using the nn.Transformer module.

- [Transformer — PyTorch 2.1 documentation]: This is the official documentation of the Transformer class in PyTorch, which provides detailed explanations of its parameters and methods.

- [Transforming and augmenting images - PyTorch](^3^): This is a tutorial on how to apply various transformations and augmentations to images using torchvision.transforms.

- [Building Models with PyTorch](^4^): This is an overview of how to build different types of models with PyTorch, including transformers.

- [Transforms — PyTorch Tutorials](^5^): This is another tutorial on how to use transforms in torchvision.datasets.

Source:

(1) Language Modeling with nn.Transformer and torchtext — PyTorch Tutorials .... https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/transformer_tutorial.html.

(2) https://github.com/pytorch/examples/tree/master/word_language_model.

(3) Transforming and augmenting images - PyTorch. https://pytorch.org/vision/stable/transforms.html.

(4) Building Models with PyTorch. https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/introyt/modelsyt_tutorial.html?highlight=transformer.

(5) Transforms — PyTorch Tutorials 2.2.0+cu121 documentation. https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/basics/transforms_tutorial.html.

(6) Transformer — PyTorch 2.1 documentation. https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.nn.Transformer.html.

(7) Getty Images. https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/pytorch-logo-displayed-on-a-phone-screen-and-a-laptop-news-photo/1236945622.

How do I use a pre-trained model in Transformers library?

To use a pre-trained model in the Transformers library, you need to have the Transformers library installed on your system. You can use pip to install it from the command line, or follow the instructions on the official website of Transformers ¹. Once you have installed the Transformers library, you can import the model and tokenizer classes from it and use them to load a pre-trained model from disk or from a URL. For example, you can use the following code to load a pre-trained BERT model and tokenizer:

```python

# Import libraries

from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer

# Load pre-trained model and tokenizer

model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("bert-base-uncased")

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("bert-base-uncased")

```

You can also use the `from_pretrained` method to load a pre-trained model from a local directory that contains the configuration file and the state dictionary of the model. For example, you can use the following code to load a pre-trained TransfoXL model and tokenizer from your local directory:

```python

# Import libraries

from transformers import AutoModelForSequenceClassification, AutoTokenizer

# Load pre-trained model and tokenizer from local directory

model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("/my/local/models/transfo-xl-wt103")

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("/my/local/models/transfo-xl-wt103")

```

You can find more information and examples on how to use pre-trained models in the Transformers library in these web search results:

- [Fine-tune a pretrained model - Hugging Face](^5^): This is a tutorial on how to fine-tune a pre-trained model with different frameworks, such as PyTorch, TensorFlow, or Keras.

- [Load a pre-trained model from disk with Huggingface Transformers - Stack Overflow](^2^): This is an answer that explains how to load a pre-trained model from disk using PyTorch.

- [Download pre-trained sentence-transformers model locally - Stack Overflow](^3^): This is an answer that shows how to download and load a pre-trained sentence-transformers model locally.

- [How to Load a pre-trained model from disk with Huggingface Transformers - AppDividend](^4^): This is an article that provides more details and screenshots on how to load a pre-trained model from disk using PyTorch.

Source:

(1) Fine-tune a pretrained model - Hugging Face. https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/training.

(2)https://huggingface.co/models.

(3) Load a pre-trained model from disk with Huggingface Transformers. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64001128/load-a-pre-trained-model-from-disk-with-huggingface-transformers.

(4) Download pre-trained sentence-transformers model locally. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65419499/download-pre-trained-sentence-transformers-model-locally.

(5) How to Load a pre-trained model from disk with Huggingface Transformers. https://appdividend.com/2023/03/17/load-a-pre-trained-model-from-disk-with-huggingface-transformers/.

(6)https://huggingface.co/bert-base-cased.

What is the difference between BERT and GPT-2?

BERT and GPT-2 are two of the most popular and powerful language models in natural language processing (NLP). They both use the transformer architecture, which is a neural network model that can process sequential data, such as text or speech. However, they have some key differences in their design, training, and applications.

One of the main differences between BERT and GPT-2 is the directionality of their attention mechanism. Attention is a technique that allows the model to focus on the most relevant parts of the input or output sequence. BERT uses bidirectional attention, which means it can look at both the left and right context of each word. This helps BERT capture the meaning of words in relation to each other and to the whole sentence. GPT-2 uses unidirectional attention, which means it can only look at the left context of each word. This makes GPT-2 more suitable for generating text from left to right, but less able to understand complex sentences.

Another difference between BERT and GPT-2 is the type of training objective they use. BERT is trained using a masked language modeling objective, where some words in a sentence are randomly masked (hidden) and the model has to predict what they are based on the surrounding context. This helps BERT learn how words are related to each other and how they form phrases or sentences. GPT-2 is trained using a language modeling objective, where the model has to predict what word comes next in a sequence based on what has been written before. This helps GPT-2 learn how words are used in natural language and how they form coherent texts.

A third difference between BERT and GPT-2 is their applications and domains. BERT is mainly used for natural language understanding (NLU), which is the task of extracting meaning from text or speech. BERT can be used for various NLU tasks, such as question answering, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, and more. GPT-2 is mainly used for natural language generation (NLG), which is the task of creating text or speech from data or information. GPT-2 can be used for various NLG tasks, such as text summarization, text completion, text rewriting, code generation, and more.

I hope this answer helps you understand what BERT and GPT-2 are and what they are different from each other. If you want to learn more about these models, you can check out these web search results:

- [GPT vs. BERT: What Are the Differences Between the Two Most Popular Language Models? - MUO](^5^): This is an article that explains how GPT and BERT work and compare their advantages and disadvantages.

- [Key difference between BERT and GPT2? - Stack Overflow](^6^): This is an answer that summarizes the main differences between BERT and GPT2 in terms of architecture, training objective, and applications.

- [BERT vs GPT: Comparison of Two Leading AI Language Models - 360DigiTMG](^3^): This is an article that compares BERT and GPT in terms of their features, performance, limitations, use cases, etc.

- [BERT vs GPT architectural, conceptual and implemetational differences](^4^): This is an answer that discusses some technical aspects of how BERT and GPT differ in their design.

Source: 

(1) https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/src/transformers/models/bert/modeling_bert.py.

(2) https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/master/src/transformers/models/gpt2/modeling_gpt2.py.

(3) BERT vs GPT: Comparison of Two Leading AI Language Models - 360DigiTMG. https://360digitmg.com/blog/gpt-vs-bert.

(4) BERT vs GPT architectural, conceptual and implemetational differences. https://datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/104536/bert-vs-gpt-architectural-conceptual-and-implemetational-differences.

(5) GPT vs. BERT: What Are the Differences Between the Two Most ... - MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/gpt-vs-bert/.

(6) gpt 2 - Key difference between BERT and GPT2? - Stack Overflow. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66852791/key-difference-between-bert-and-gpt2.